These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22559382)

  • 1. Contributions of cochlea-scaled entropy and consonant-vowel boundaries to prediction of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4104-13. PubMed ID: 22559382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility.
    Stilp CE; Kluender KR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jul; 107(27):12387-92. PubMed ID: 20566842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual contributions of the consonant-vowel boundary to sentence intelligibility.
    Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):847-57. PubMed ID: 19640049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1262-71. PubMed ID: 20815461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3947. PubMed ID: 19206819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the perceptual contributions of cochlear-scaled entropy and speech level.
    Shu Y; Feng XX; Chen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):EL517. PubMed ID: 28040015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3114-25. PubMed ID: 21110607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1568-76. PubMed ID: 24606291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the perceptual contributions of level-dependent segments to sentence intelligibility.
    Guan T; Chu GX; Tsao Y; Chen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3745. PubMed ID: 27908047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of vowel and consonant fundamental frequency, envelope, and temporal fine structure cues to the intelligibility of words and sentences.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1490-501. PubMed ID: 22352519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech intelligibility is best predicted by intensity, not cochlea-scaled entropy.
    Oxenham AJ; Boucher JE; Kreft HA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):EL264. PubMed ID: 28964094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlea-scaled spectral entropy predicts rate-invariant intelligibility of temporally distorted sentences.
    Stilp CE; Kiefte M; Alexander JM; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2112-26. PubMed ID: 20968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions.
    Ma J; Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3387-405. PubMed ID: 19425678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.