These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22559613)

  • 1. Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: a 4AFC human observer study.
    Timberg P; Baath M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2431-7. PubMed ID: 22559613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.
    Timberg P; Båth M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5618-26. PubMed ID: 21158273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact on lesion detection via a multi-vendor study: A phantom-based comparison of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and synthetic mammography.
    Vancoillie L; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6270-6292. PubMed ID: 34407213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A
    Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimized signal of calcifications in wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis: a virtual imaging trial.
    Vancoillie L; Cockmartin L; Lueck F; Marshall N; Keupers M; Nanke R; Kappler S; Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6309-6319. PubMed ID: 38546790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging.
    Mackenzie A; Thomson EL; Mitchell M; Elangovan P; van Ongeval C; Cockmartin L; Warren LM; Wilkinson LS; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM; Dance DR; Young KC
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):806-814. PubMed ID: 34331118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies.
    Ruschin M; Timberg P; Båth M; Hemdal B; Svahn T; Saunders RS; Samei E; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Chakrabort DP; Tingber A
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):400-7. PubMed ID: 17388156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography.
    Förnvik D; Zackrisson S; Ljungberg O; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 20105090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.
    Andersson I; Ikeda DM; Zackrisson S; Ruschin M; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Dec; 18(12):2817-25. PubMed ID: 18641998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative performance of multiview stereoscopic and mammographic display modalities for breast lesion detection.
    Webb LJ; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA; Ghate SV; Kim C; Soo MS; Walsh R
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1972-80. PubMed ID: 21626930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):7092-7112. PubMed ID: 27648708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Funke M; Grabbe EH
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
    Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens.
    Rößler AC; Kalender W; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Preuss C; Peter SC; Brehm B; Hammon M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 27888024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
    Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.