173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22559657)
1. Multimodal μCT/μMR based semiautomated segmentation of rat vertebrae affected by mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic metastases.
Hojjat SP; Foltz W; Wise-Milestone L; Whyne CM
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2848-53. PubMed ID: 22559657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can micro-imaging based analysis methods quantify structural integrity of rat vertebrae with and without metastatic involvement?
Hojjat SP; Beek M; Akens MK; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2012 Sep; 45(14):2342-8. PubMed ID: 22858318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micro-computed tomography-based highly automated 3D segmentation of the rat spine for quantitative analysis of metastatic disease.
Hojjat SP; Hardisty MR; Whyne CM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 20809732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated quantitative microstructural analysis of metastatically involved vertebrae: effects of stereologic model and spatial resolution.
Hojjat SP; Whyne CM
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 21036094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the effects of mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic metastasis on vertebral bone quality in a new rat model.
Wise-Milestone L; Akens MK; Rosol TJ; Hojjat SP; Grynpas MD; Whyne CM
J Orthop Res; 2012 May; 30(5):817-23. PubMed ID: 22025272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local treatment of mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic spinal metastases: is photodynamic therapy effective?
Wise-Milestone L; Akens MK; Lo VC; Yee AJ; Wilson BC; Whyne CM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(3):899-908. PubMed ID: 22058005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. μFE models can represent microdamaged regions of healthy and metastatically involved whole vertebrae identified through histology and contrast enhanced μCT imaging.
Choudhari C; Chan K; Akens MK; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 26947031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical behavior of metastatic vertebrae are influenced by tissue architecture, mineral content, and organic feature alterations.
Burke M; Akens M; Kiss A; Willett T; Whyne C
J Orthop Res; 2018 Nov; 36(11):3013-3022. PubMed ID: 29978906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative characterization of metastatic disease in the spine. Part I. Semiautomated segmentation using atlas-based deformable registration and the level set method.
Hardisty M; Gordon L; Agarwal P; Skrinskas T; Whyne C
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3127-34. PubMed ID: 17879773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of the effect of osteolytic metastases on bone strain within whole vertebrae using image registration.
Hardisty MR; Akens MK; Hojjat SP; Yee A; Whyne CM
J Orthop Res; 2012 Jul; 30(7):1032-9. PubMed ID: 22213180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for diagnosing vertebral metastases due to prostate cancer in comparison to other primary tumors].
Hackländer T; Scharwächter C; Golz R; Mertens H
Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 16612731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of automatic thresholding approaches for 3D x-ray microtomography of trabecular bone.
Gómez W; Sales E; Lopes RT; Pereira WC
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091903. PubMed ID: 24007154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of Predominantly Osteoblastic and Osteolytic Spine Metastases by Using Susceptibility-weighted MRI.
Böker SM; Adams LC; Bender YY; Fahlenkamp UL; Wagner M; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 30375926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-destructive evaluation of the effects of combined bisphosphonate and photodynamic therapy on bone strain in metastatic vertebrae using image registration.
Hojjat SP; Won E; Hardisty MR; Akens MK; Wise-Milestone LM; Whyne CM
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2816-22. PubMed ID: 21818534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated MicroCT-based bone and articular cartilage analysis using iterative shape averaging and atlas-based registration.
Newton MD; Junginger L; Maerz T
Bone; 2020 Aug; 137():115417. PubMed ID: 32416288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods.
Shahedi M; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Bauman GS; Bastian-Jordan M; Gibson E; Rodrigues G; Ahmad B; Lock M; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):113503. PubMed ID: 25370674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and experimental imaging of breast cancer metastases in the spine.
Petrén-Mallmin M
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1994; 391():1-23. PubMed ID: 8172006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Registration of 2D histological sections with 3D micro-CT datasets from small animal vertebrae and tibiae.
Museyko O; Marshall RP; Lu J; Hess A; Schett G; Amling M; Kalender WA; Engelke K
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(15):1658-73. PubMed ID: 25136982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multimodal-3D imaging based on μMRI and μCT techniques bridges the gap with histology in visualization of the bone regeneration process.
Sinibaldi R; Conti A; Sinjari B; Spadone S; Pecci R; Palombo M; Komlev VS; Ortore MG; Tromba G; Capuani S; Guidotti R; De Luca F; Caputi S; Traini T; Della Penna S
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2018 Mar; 12(3):750-761. PubMed ID: 28593731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative characterization of metastatic disease in the spine. Part II. Histogram-based analyses.
Whyne C; Hardisty M; Wu F; Skrinskas T; Clemons M; Gordon L; Basran PS
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3279-85. PubMed ID: 17879791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
