These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22559660)

  • 21. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
    Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Technical Note: Three-dimensional QA of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatments by a dose-volume histogram methodology and its comparison with 3D gamma results.
    Acurio ESR; Lizar JC; Arruda GV; Pavoni JF
    Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3208-3215. PubMed ID: 33768577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 3D dose verification in 192Ir HDR prostate monotherapy using polymer gels and MRI.
    Kipouros P; Papagiannis P; Sakelliou L; Karaiskos P; Sandilos P; Baras P; Seimenis I; Kozicki M; Anagnostopoulos G; Baltas D
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2031-9. PubMed ID: 12945969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The application of polymer gel dosimeters to dosimetry for targeted radionuclide therapy.
    Gear JI; Flux GD; Charles-Edwards E; Partridge M; Cook G; Ott RJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3503-16. PubMed ID: 16825745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3D evaluation of 3DVH program using BANG3 polymer gel dosimeter.
    Watanabe Y; Nakaguchi Y
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082101. PubMed ID: 23927338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A dose delivery verification method for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy using measured field fluence distributions.
    Renner WD; Sarfaraz M; Earl MA; Yu CX
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2996-3005. PubMed ID: 14655947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of 3D dose distributions for HDR 192Ir brachytherapy sources with normoxic polymer gel dosimetry and treatment planning system.
    Senkesen O; Tezcanli E; Buyuksarac B; Ozbay I
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 24933316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. TransitQA - A new method for transit dosimetry of Tomotherapy patients.
    Pisaturo O; Miéville F; Tercier PA; Allal AS
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):438-447. PubMed ID: 29136280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy by means of static tomotherapy: a planning and verification study.
    Oldham M; Webb S
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 9198015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
    Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consistency check of planned adaptive option on helical tomotherapy.
    Schirm M; Yartsev S; Bauman G; Battista J; Van Dyk J
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 7(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 19044321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.
    Hayashi A; Shibamoto Y; Hattori Y; Tamura T; Iwabuchi M; Otsuka S; Sugie C; Yanagi T
    J Radiat Res; 2015 Mar; 56(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 25609741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gel dosimetry for the dose verification of intensity modulated radiotherapy treatments.
    De Deene Y
    Z Med Phys; 2002; 12(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 12145912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MRI-based treatment planning for radiotherapy: dosimetric verification for prostate IMRT.
    Chen L; Price RA; Wang L; Li J; Qin L; McNeeley S; Ma CM; Freedman GM; Pollack A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):636-47. PubMed ID: 15380601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo evaluation of a treatment planning system for helical tomotherapy in an anthropomorphic heterogeneous phantom and for clinical treatment plans.
    Zhao YL; Mackenzie M; Kirkby C; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5366-74. PubMed ID: 19175096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Heterogeneity phantoms for visualization of 3D dose distributions by MRI-based polymer gel dosimetry.
    Watanabe Y; Mooij R; Perera GM; Maryanski MJ
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):975-84. PubMed ID: 15191281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative analysis of geometric information from an end-to-end examination of IMRT and VMAT using the optimal selection method.
    Tachibana H; Takahashi R
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061709. PubMed ID: 23718588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) relative to IMRT and helical tomotherapy in the management of localized, locally advanced, and post-operative prostate cancer.
    Davidson MT; Blake SJ; Batchelar DL; Cheung P; Mah K
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1550-8. PubMed ID: 21543164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Position-probability-sampled Monte Carlo calculation of VMAT, 3DCRT, step-shoot IMRT, and helical tomotherapy dose distributions using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc.
    Belec J; Ploquin N; La Russa DJ; Clark BG
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):948-60. PubMed ID: 21452731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of a computational method for assessing the impact of intra-fraction motion on helical tomotherapy plans.
    Ngwa W; Meeks SL; Kupelian PA; Schnarr E; Langen KM
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6611-21. PubMed ID: 19826197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.