140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2255989)
1. Class II composite resin restorations: a three-year clinical study of six different posterior composites.
Lundin SA; Andersson B; Koch G; Rasmusson CG
Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(3):105-14. PubMed ID: 2255989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results.
Rasmusson CG; Lundin SA
Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8614898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Class I and II composite resin restorations: 4-year clinical follow up.
Lundin SA; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):217-27. PubMed ID: 2603125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
Barnes DM; Blank LW; Thompson VP; Holston AM; Gingell JC
Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2068249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations.
Lundin SA
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 73():1-41. PubMed ID: 2264013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years.
Nordbø H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR
Quintessence Int; 1998 Jan; 29(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 9611469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo occlusal wear of posterior composite restorations.
Lewis G
Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 1803330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microhardness and porosity of Class 2 light-cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light-curing wand.
Von Beetzen M; Li J; Nicander I; Sundström F
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8415161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years.
Lundin SA; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(5-6):165-71. PubMed ID: 10901600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
Dresch W; Volpato S; Gomes JC; Ribeiro NR; Reis A; Loguercio AD
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 16924980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
