These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22560561)

  • 1. Interest and attitudes of patients, cancer physicians, medical students and cancer researchers towards a spectrum of genetic tests relevant to breast cancer patients.
    Ngoi N; Lee SC; Hartman M; Khin LW; Wong A
    Breast; 2013 Feb; 22(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 22560561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tamoxifen as chemoprevention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer: a pilot survey of physicians.
    Peshkin BN; Isaacs C; Finch C; Kent S; Schwartz MD
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Dec; 21(23):4322-8. PubMed ID: 14645421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation.
    Hamann HA; Croyle RT; Venne VL; Baty BJ; Smith KR; Botkin JR
    Am J Med Genet; 2000 May; 92(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 10797419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interest in BRCA1/2 testing in a primary care population.
    Armstrong K; Weber B; Ubel PA; Guerra C; Schwartz JS
    Prev Med; 2002 Jun; 34(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 12052018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual and family characteristics associated with BRCA1/2 genetic testing in high-risk families.
    Katapodi MC; Northouse LL; Milliron KJ; Liu G; Merajver SD
    Psychooncology; 2013 Jun; 22(6):1336-43. PubMed ID: 22826208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing for breast cancer risk in our region of southeastern Georgia.
    MacNew HG; Rudolph R; Brower ST; Beck AN; Meister EA
    Breast J; 2010; 16(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 20030654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge, attitudes and behavior of physicians regarding predictive genetic tests for breast and colorectal cancer.
    Marzuillo C; De Vito C; Boccia S; D'Addario M; D'Andrea E; Santini P; Boccia A; Villari P
    Prev Med; 2013 Nov; 57(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 23827720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BRCA testing of breast cancer patients: medical specialists' referral patterns, knowledge and attitudes to genetic testing.
    Van Riel E; Wárlám-Rodenhuis CC; Verhoef S; Rutgers EJ; Ausems MG
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 May; 19(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 19659662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct-to-patient BRCA1 testing: the Twoj Styl experience.
    Gronwald J; Huzarski T; Byrski T; Debniak T; Metcalfe K; Narod SA; Lubiński J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 100(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 16807675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opinion about reproductive decision making among individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a multicentre Spanish cohort.
    Fortuny D; Balmaña J; Graña B; Torres A; Ramón y Cajal T; Darder E; Gadea N; Velasco A; López C; Sanz J; Alonso C; Brunet J
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Apr; 24(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 19112076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Too much, too soon? Patients and health professionals' views concerning the impact of genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in women under the age of 40.
    Ardern-Jones A; Kenen R; Eeles R
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2005 Jul; 14(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 15952973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.
    Bottorff JL; Ratner PA; Balneaves LG; Richardson CG; McCullum M; Hack T; Chalmers K; Buxton J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 11815405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
    Schwartz MD; Lerman C; Brogan B; Peshkin BN; Isaacs C; DeMarco T; Halbert CH; Pennanen M; Finch C
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Apr; 14(4):1003-7. PubMed ID: 15824179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families.
    Struewing JP; Lerman C; Kase RG; Giambarresi TR; Tucker MA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1995 Mar; 4(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 7742725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Awareness and utilization of BRCA1/2 testing among U.S. primary care physicians.
    Bellcross CA; Kolor K; Goddard KA; Coates RJ; Reyes M; Khoury MJ
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Jan; 40(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 21146769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disparities in BRCA testing: when insurance coverage is not a barrier.
    Olaya W; Esquivel P; Wong JH; Morgan JW; Freeberg A; Roy-Chowdhury S; Lum SS
    Am J Surg; 2009 Oct; 198(4):562-5. PubMed ID: 19800469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing.
    Armstrong K; Calzone K; Stopfer J; Fitzgerald G; Coyne J; Weber B
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Nov; 9(11):1251-4. PubMed ID: 11097234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International variation in physicians' attitudes towards prophylactic mastectomy - comparison between France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
    Den Heijer M; van Asperen CJ; Harris H; Nippert I; Schmidtke J; Bouhnik AD; Julian-Reynier C; Evans DG; Tibben A
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Sep; 49(13):2798-805. PubMed ID: 23692813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitude towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a comparison of affected and unaffected women.
    Bruno M; Digennaro M; Tommasi S; Stea B; Danese T; Schittulli F; Paradiso A
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 May; 19(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 19912305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.