These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22561021)

  • 1. Assessment of left ventricular parameters in orthotopic heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: comparison with MRI.
    Arraiza M; Azcárate PM; De Cecco CN; Viteri G; Simón-Yarza I; Hernández-Estefanía R; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3282-8. PubMed ID: 22561021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of left atrial volumes and function in orthotopic heart transplant recipients by dual-source CT: comparison with MRI.
    Bastarrika G; Zudaire B; Ferreira M; Arraiza M; Sáiz-Mendiguren R; Rábago G
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 20027119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease.
    Bak SH; Ko SM; Jeon HJ; Yang HS; Hwang HK; Song MG
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 22319133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function in cardiac transplant recipients: Side-by-side comparison of real time two-dimensional echocardiography, contrast-enhanced two-dimensional echocardiography, three-dimensional echocardiography, and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional echocardiography as compared to magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rodriguez-Mañero M; Azcárate-Agüero P; Kreidieh B; Alvez MT; Martínez-Monzonís A; Diaz-Dorronsoro A; Cid-Menéndez A; González-Juanatey JR; Barba-Cosials J; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
    Echocardiography; 2019 Feb; 36(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30600566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modality Accuracy of Dual-step, Prospectively Electrocardiography-triggered Dual-source Computed Tomorgaphy Compared With Same-day Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Follow-up of Heart-transplant Patients.
    Marano R; Merlino B; Natale L; Savino G; Vingiani V; Rovere G; Larici AR; Iezzi R; Magarelli N; Lombardo A; Pasquale M; Manfredi R
    J Thorac Imaging; 2018 Jul; 33(4):217-224. PubMed ID: 29389808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and MRI: initial clinical experience.
    Bastarrika G; Arraiza M; De Cecco CN; Mastrobuoni S; Ubilla M; Rábago G
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1784-90. PubMed ID: 18491100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes: comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography.
    Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Trindade PT; Plass AR; Husmann L; Leschka S; Genoni M; Marincek B; Kaufmann PA; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2008 May; 43(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 18424948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of global left and right ventricular function using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in comparison to MRI: an experimental study in a porcine model.
    Bruners P; Mahnken AH; Knackstedt C; Luhmann N; Spüntrup E; Das M; Hohl C; Wildberger JE; Schmitz-Rode T; Günther RW; Mühlenbruch G
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Nov; 42(11):756-64. PubMed ID: 18030198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of ventricular contrast medium attenuation on the accuracy of left and right ventricular function analysis at cardiac multi detector-row CT compared with cardiac MRI.
    Lee H; Kim SY; Gebregziabher M; Hanna EL; Schoepf UJ
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):395-405. PubMed ID: 22225726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of different reconstruction intervals to quantify left ventricular function and mass in cardiac computed tomography examinations.
    Arraiza M; Azcárate PM; Arias J; de Cecco CN; Pueyo JC; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
    Radiologia; 2012; 54(5):432-41. PubMed ID: 21920566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings.
    Busch S; Johnson TR; Wintersperger BJ; Minaifar N; Bhargava A; Rist C; Reiser MF; Becker C; Nikolaou K
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 17909817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dual-source computed tomography: effect on regional and global left ventricular function assessment compared to magnetic resonance imaging].
    Lüders F; Fischbach R; Seifarth H; Wessling J; Heindel W; Juergens KU
    Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):962-9. PubMed ID: 19517343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
    Schlosser T; Mohrs OK; Magedanz A; Voigtländer T; Schmermund A; Barkhausen J
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17325922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of manual, semi- and fully automated heart segmentation for assessing global left ventricular function in multidetector computed tomography.
    Plumhans C; Keil S; Ocklenburg C; Mühlenbruch G; Behrendt FF; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):476-82. PubMed ID: 19561515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements by high-definition blood flow imaging: Comparisons with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and contrast echocardiography.
    Ahmad M; Wu G; Frank L; Dimaano MM
    Echocardiography; 2020 Dec; 37(12):1975-1980. PubMed ID: 33091164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.
    Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of left ventricular volumes with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: real-life evaluation of standard versus new semiautomatic methods.
    Aurich M; André F; Keller M; Greiner S; Hess A; Buss SJ; Katus HA; Mereles D
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Oct; 27(10):1017-24. PubMed ID: 25129394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global left-ventricular function assessment using dual-source multidetector CT: effect of improved temporal resolution on ventricular volume measurement.
    Puesken M; Fischbach R; Wenker M; Seifarth H; Maintz D; Heindel W; Juergens KU
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Oct; 18(10):2087-94. PubMed ID: 18449547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular volumes to full volume magnetic resonance imaging in normal and diseased rats.
    Arias T; Chen J; Fayad ZA; Fuster V; Hajjar RJ; Chemaly ER
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Aug; 26(8):910-8. PubMed ID: 23706342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Kim J; Cohen SB; Atalay MK; Maslow AD; Poppas A
    Echocardiography; 2015 May; 32(5):805-12. PubMed ID: 25109323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.