314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22561021)
1. Assessment of left ventricular parameters in orthotopic heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: comparison with MRI.
Arraiza M; Azcárate PM; De Cecco CN; Viteri G; Simón-Yarza I; Hernández-Estefanía R; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3282-8. PubMed ID: 22561021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of left atrial volumes and function in orthotopic heart transplant recipients by dual-source CT: comparison with MRI.
Bastarrika G; Zudaire B; Ferreira M; Arraiza M; Sáiz-Mendiguren R; Rábago G
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 20027119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease.
Bak SH; Ko SM; Jeon HJ; Yang HS; Hwang HK; Song MG
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 22319133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function in cardiac transplant recipients: Side-by-side comparison of real time two-dimensional echocardiography, contrast-enhanced two-dimensional echocardiography, three-dimensional echocardiography, and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional echocardiography as compared to magnetic resonance imaging.
Rodriguez-Mañero M; Azcárate-Agüero P; Kreidieh B; Alvez MT; Martínez-Monzonís A; Diaz-Dorronsoro A; Cid-Menéndez A; González-Juanatey JR; Barba-Cosials J; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
Echocardiography; 2019 Feb; 36(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30600566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-modality Accuracy of Dual-step, Prospectively Electrocardiography-triggered Dual-source Computed Tomorgaphy Compared With Same-day Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Follow-up of Heart-transplant Patients.
Marano R; Merlino B; Natale L; Savino G; Vingiani V; Rovere G; Larici AR; Iezzi R; Magarelli N; Lombardo A; Pasquale M; Manfredi R
J Thorac Imaging; 2018 Jul; 33(4):217-224. PubMed ID: 29389808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and MRI: initial clinical experience.
Bastarrika G; Arraiza M; De Cecco CN; Mastrobuoni S; Ubilla M; Rábago G
Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1784-90. PubMed ID: 18491100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes: comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography.
Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Trindade PT; Plass AR; Husmann L; Leschka S; Genoni M; Marincek B; Kaufmann PA; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2008 May; 43(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 18424948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of global left and right ventricular function using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in comparison to MRI: an experimental study in a porcine model.
Bruners P; Mahnken AH; Knackstedt C; Luhmann N; Spüntrup E; Das M; Hohl C; Wildberger JE; Schmitz-Rode T; Günther RW; Mühlenbruch G
Invest Radiol; 2007 Nov; 42(11):756-64. PubMed ID: 18030198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of ventricular contrast medium attenuation on the accuracy of left and right ventricular function analysis at cardiac multi detector-row CT compared with cardiac MRI.
Lee H; Kim SY; Gebregziabher M; Hanna EL; Schoepf UJ
Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):395-405. PubMed ID: 22225726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of different reconstruction intervals to quantify left ventricular function and mass in cardiac computed tomography examinations.
Arraiza M; Azcárate PM; Arias J; de Cecco CN; Pueyo JC; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
Radiologia; 2012; 54(5):432-41. PubMed ID: 21920566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings.
Busch S; Johnson TR; Wintersperger BJ; Minaifar N; Bhargava A; Rist C; Reiser MF; Becker C; Nikolaou K
Eur Radiol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 17909817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Dual-source computed tomography: effect on regional and global left ventricular function assessment compared to magnetic resonance imaging].
Lüders F; Fischbach R; Seifarth H; Wessling J; Heindel W; Juergens KU
Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):962-9. PubMed ID: 19517343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
Schlosser T; Mohrs OK; Magedanz A; Voigtländer T; Schmermund A; Barkhausen J
Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17325922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of manual, semi- and fully automated heart segmentation for assessing global left ventricular function in multidetector computed tomography.
Plumhans C; Keil S; Ocklenburg C; Mühlenbruch G; Behrendt FF; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):476-82. PubMed ID: 19561515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements by high-definition blood flow imaging: Comparisons with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and contrast echocardiography.
Ahmad M; Wu G; Frank L; Dimaano MM
Echocardiography; 2020 Dec; 37(12):1975-1980. PubMed ID: 33091164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.
Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of left ventricular volumes with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: real-life evaluation of standard versus new semiautomatic methods.
Aurich M; André F; Keller M; Greiner S; Hess A; Buss SJ; Katus HA; Mereles D
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Oct; 27(10):1017-24. PubMed ID: 25129394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Global left-ventricular function assessment using dual-source multidetector CT: effect of improved temporal resolution on ventricular volume measurement.
Puesken M; Fischbach R; Wenker M; Seifarth H; Maintz D; Heindel W; Juergens KU
Eur Radiol; 2008 Oct; 18(10):2087-94. PubMed ID: 18449547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular volumes to full volume magnetic resonance imaging in normal and diseased rats.
Arias T; Chen J; Fayad ZA; Fuster V; Hajjar RJ; Chemaly ER
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Aug; 26(8):910-8. PubMed ID: 23706342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kim J; Cohen SB; Atalay MK; Maslow AD; Poppas A
Echocardiography; 2015 May; 32(5):805-12. PubMed ID: 25109323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
