665 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22561178)
21. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of robotics on the outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer.
Lavoue V; Zeng X; Lau S; Press JZ; Abitbol J; Gotlieb R; How J; Wang Y; Gotlieb WH
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):556-62. PubMed ID: 24708920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of reoperation rates, perioperative outcomes in women with endometrial cancer when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to laparoscopy.
Boosz A; Haeberle L; Renner SP; Thiel FC; Mehlhorn G; Beckmann MW; Mueller A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1215-20. PubMed ID: 25009071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can Teamwork and High-Volume Experience Overcome Challenges of Lymphadenectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients (Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m2 or Greater) with Endometrial Cancer?: A Cohort Study of Robotics and Laparotomy and Review of Literature.
Fornalik H; Zore T; Fornalik N; Foster T; Katschke A; Wright G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):959-966. PubMed ID: 29621128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.
Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrospective comparative study of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and laparotomy for endometrial cancer in patients with a low risk of recurrence.
Hayashi S; Yamanaka Z; Kojima J; Ono M; Sasaki T; Yamamoto A; Ono M; Futagami M; Nishi H
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Jan; 50(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 37848280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.
Devaja O; Samara I; Papadopoulos AJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 May; 20(4):570-5. PubMed ID: 20686375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study.
Holub Z; Jabor A; Bartos P; Eim J; Urbánek S; Pivovarniková R
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 12214729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and recurrence with laparoscopy, vaginal/laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Magrina JF; Zanagnolo V; Giles D; Noble BN; Kho RM; Magtibay PM
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2011; 32(5):476-80. PubMed ID: 22053656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis].
Li XM; Wang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 28355689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative Surgical Outcomes for Endometrial Cancer Patients 65 Years Old or Older Staged With Robotics or Laparotomy.
Doo DW; Guntupalli SR; Corr BR; Sheeder J; Davidson SA; Behbakht K; Jarrett MJ; Guy MS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(11):3687-94. PubMed ID: 25672563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Robot assisted laparoscopic staging of endometrial cancer--comparison with standard laparotomy].
Pilka R; Marek R; Táborská S; Dzvincuk P
Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Dec; 76(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 22312843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of lymphedema incidence between 2 lymphadenectomy techniques in patients with uterine cancer undergoing robotic staging.
Menderes G; Azodi M; Schwartz P; Silasi DA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jan; 25(1):160-5. PubMed ID: 25386859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.
Nieto VL; Huang Y; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):463.e1-463.e12. PubMed ID: 30086293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Nov; 282(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 20652285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
