These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22562727)

  • 1. Estimating a reference standard segmentation with spatially varying performance parameters: local MAP STAPLE.
    Commowick O; Akhondi-Asl A; Warfield SK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Aug; 31(8):1593-606. PubMed ID: 22562727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of inferential uncertainty in assessing expert segmentation performance from STAPLE.
    Commowick O; Warfield SK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 20199913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of inferential uncertainty in assessing expert segmentation performance from STAPLE.
    Commowick O; Warfield SK
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():701-12. PubMed ID: 19694305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating priors on expert performance parameters for segmentation validation and label fusion: a maximum a posteriori STAPLE.
    Commowick O; Warfield SK
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 3):25-32. PubMed ID: 20879379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation.
    Warfield SK; Zou KH; Wells WM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):903-21. PubMed ID: 15250643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation through fusion of probabilistic segmentations.
    Akhondi-Asl A; Warfield SK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1840-52. PubMed ID: 23744673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal MAP Parameters Estimation in STAPLE Using Local Intensity Similarity Information.
    Gorthi S; Akhondi-Asl A; Warfield SK
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Sep; 19(5):1589-97. PubMed ID: 25955854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A logarithmic opinion pool based STAPLE algorithm for the fusion of segmentations with associated reliability weights.
    Akhondi-Asl A; Hoyte L; Lockhart ME; Warfield SK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1997-2009. PubMed ID: 24951681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. iSTAPLE: Improved Label Fusion for Segmentation by Combining STAPLE with Image Intensity.
    Liu X; Montillo A; Tan ET; Schenck JF
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2013 Feb; 8669():. PubMed ID: 31741552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combination strategies in multi-atlas image segmentation: application to brain MR data.
    Artaechevarria X; Munoz-Barrutia A; Ortiz-de-Solorzano C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Aug; 28(8):1266-77. PubMed ID: 19228554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An algorithm for optimal fusion of atlases with different labeling protocols.
    Iglesias JE; Sabuncu MR; Aganj I; Bhatt P; Casillas C; Salat D; Boxer A; Fischl B; Van Leemput K
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():451-63. PubMed ID: 25463466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-atlas learner fusion: An efficient segmentation approach for large-scale data.
    Asman AJ; Huo Y; Plassard AJ; Landman BA
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Dec; 26(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 26363845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-local statistical label fusion for multi-atlas segmentation.
    Asman AJ; Landman BA
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 23265798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cautionary analysis of STAPLE using direct inference of segmentation truth.
    Van Leemput K; Sabuncu MR
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 1):398-406. PubMed ID: 25333143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Pipitone J; Park MT; Winterburn J; Lett TA; Lerch JP; Pruessner JC; Lepage M; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM;
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():494-512. PubMed ID: 24784800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whole-body bone segmentation from MRI for PET/MRI attenuation correction using shape-based averaging.
    Arabi H; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5848. PubMed ID: 27806602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE).
    Langerak TR; van der Heide UA; Kotte AN; Viergever MA; van Vulpen M; Pluim JP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Dec; 29(12):2000-8. PubMed ID: 20667809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-based evaluation of segmentation algorithms for diffusion-weighted MRI without using a gold standard.
    Jha AK; Kupinski MA; Rodríguez JJ; Stephen RM; Stopeck AT
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(13):4425-46. PubMed ID: 22713231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of image segmentation by estimating rater bias and variance.
    Warfield SK; Zou KH; Wells WM
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2361-75. PubMed ID: 18407896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterizing spatially varying performance to improve multi-atlas multi-label segmentation.
    Asman AJ; Landman BA
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2011; 22():85-96. PubMed ID: 21761648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.