BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22563633)

  • 1. How should witnesses regulate the accuracy of their identification decisions: one step forward, two steps back?
    Perfect TJ; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1810-8. PubMed ID: 22563633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure.
    Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving eyewitness identification accuracy by screening out those who say they don't know.
    Weber N; Perfect TJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 22471383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study.
    Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy.
    Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
    Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
    Sauerland M; Sporer SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; McKinnon AC; Weber N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19954764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does anyone else look familiar? Influencing identification decisions by asking witnesses to re-examine the lineup.
    Eisen ML; Cedré GC; Williams TQ; Jones JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):306-320. PubMed ID: 29939064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the growth of internal evidence guiding perceptual decisions.
    Ludwig CJ; Davies JR
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Sep; 63(2):61-92. PubMed ID: 21699877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups.
    Steblay NK
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confirming feedback following a mistaken identification impairs memory for the culprit.
    Smalarz L; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 24707912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criterion setting and the dynamics of recognition memory.
    Cox GE; Shiffrin RM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 22253186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating investigators: examining witnesses' influence on investigators.
    Dahl LC; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):707-32. PubMed ID: 16741634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Witnesses' blindness for their own facial recognition decisions: a field study.
    Sagana A; Sauerland M; Merckelbach H
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):624-36. PubMed ID: 24019073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.