100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22563636)
21. Assessing the costs and benefits of production in recognition.
Bodner GE; Taikh A; Fawcett JM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 23884689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The benefits of studying by production . . . And of studying production: Introduction to the special issue on the production effect in memory.
Bodner GE; MacLeod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 27244350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.
McCabe DP; Geraci L; Boman JK; Sensenig AE; Rhodes MG
Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1625-33. PubMed ID: 21963257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Are feeling-of-knowing and judgment-of-learning different? Evidence from older adults.
Souchay C; Isingrini M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):458-64. PubMed ID: 22342997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. This time it's personal: the memory benefit of hearing oneself.
Forrin ND; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):574-579. PubMed ID: 28969489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Task relevance modulates successful retrieval effects during explicit and implicit memory tests.
Elman JA; Shimamura AP
Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(1):345-53. PubMed ID: 21316476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The distinctiveness effect in forenames: the role of subjective experiences and recognition memory.
Brandt KR; Gardiner JM; Macrae CN
Br J Psychol; 2006 May; 97(Pt 2):269-80. PubMed ID: 16613653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs non-elaborative processing.
Forrin ND; Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2014; 22(5):470-80. PubMed ID: 23705973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Strong memories are hard to scale.
Mickes L; Hwe V; Wais PE; Wixted JT
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):239-57. PubMed ID: 21417544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multiple species of distinctiveness in memory? Comparing encoding versus statistical distinctiveness on recognition.
Gretz MR; Huff MJ
Memory; 2020 Sep; 28(8):984-997. PubMed ID: 32892708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
Geraci L; Manzano I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The production effect is consistent over material variations: support for the distinctiveness account.
MacLeod CM; Ozubko JD; Hourihan KL; Major JC
Memory; 2022 Sep; 30(8):1000-1007. PubMed ID: 35635318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What causes the isolation effect?
Hunt RR; Lamb CA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1359-66. PubMed ID: 11713872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Widening the boundaries of the production effect.
Forrin ND; Macleod CM; Ozubko JD
Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1046-55. PubMed ID: 22528825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The d-Prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates.
Forrin ND; Groot B; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1090-111. PubMed ID: 26820499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Distinctiveness models of memory and absolute identification: evidence for local, not global, effects.
Neath I; Brown GD; McCormack T; Chater N; Freeman R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 16556562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
Tussing AA; Greene RL
Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Directed forgetting in the list method affects recognition memory for source.
Gottlob LR; Golding JM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1524-39. PubMed ID: 17853219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
