These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22563636)

  • 41. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
    Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: the role of perceived differences in item recognition.
    Meiser T; Sattler C; Von Hecker U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jul; 60(7):1015-40. PubMed ID: 17616917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Learning to reproduce a list and memory for the learning.
    Sechler ES; Watkins MJ
    Am J Psychol; 1991; 104(3):367-94. PubMed ID: 1759695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
    Sikström S; Jönsson F
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Analyzing feature distinctiveness in the processing of living and non-living concepts in Alzheimer's disease.
    Duarte LR; Marquié L; Marquié JC; Terrier P; Ousset PJ
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 19428167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Memory and consciousness: trace distinctiveness in memory retrievals.
    Brunel L; Oker A; Riou B; Versace R
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):926-37. PubMed ID: 20932777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Test of competing explanations of the bizarre response bias in recognition memory.
    Worthen JB; Eller LS
    J Gen Psychol; 2002 Jan; 129(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 12038493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Encoding context and false recognition memories.
    Bruce D; Phillips-Grant K; Conrad N; Bona S
    Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 15615315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Test context affects recollection and familiarity ratings: implications for measuring recognition experiences.
    Tousignant C; Bodner GE
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):994-1000. PubMed ID: 22309813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Activating the critical lure during study is unnecessary for false recognition.
    Zeelenberg R; Boot I; Pecher D
    Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):316-26. PubMed ID: 15950885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Production Effect Improves Memory in 7- to 10-Year-Old Children.
    Pritchard VE; Heron-Delaney M; Malone SA; MacLeod CM
    Child Dev; 2020 May; 91(3):901-913. PubMed ID: 31099041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Affective discrimination and the implicit learning process.
    Manza L; Bornstein RF
    Conscious Cogn; 1995 Dec; 4(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 8750415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.
    Ratcliff R; Clark SE; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 2137859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Interplay of the production and picture superiority effects: a signal detection analysis.
    Fawcett JM; Quinlan CK; Taylor TL
    Memory; 2012; 20(7):655-66. PubMed ID: 22734687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. I said, you said: the production effect gets personal.
    MacLeod CM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1197-202. PubMed ID: 21938642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Combining two separate series into a single ordering: Testing the local and global distinctiveness theories with absolute and relative judgments.
    Jou J
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Jul; 72():19-30. PubMed ID: 31059976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memory.
    Bodner GE; Huff MJ; Taikh A
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1281-1294. PubMed ID: 32399916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Serial recall, word frequency, and mixed lists: the influence of item arrangement.
    Miller LM; Roodenrys S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1731-40. PubMed ID: 22582964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Categorical list differentiation by mentally retarded adolescents as a function of transfer list composition and response mode.
    Evans RA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Sep; 88(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 6638080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Osborn K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):564-71. PubMed ID: 19271869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.