344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22563674)
1. Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation.
McCracken MJ; Kramer J; Keegan KG; Lopes M; Wilson DA; Reed SK; LaCarrubba A; Rasch M
Equine Vet J; 2012 Nov; 44(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 22563674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a body-mounted inertial sensor system-based method with subjective evaluation for detection of lameness in horses.
Keegan KG; Wilson DA; Kramer J; Reed SK; Yonezawa Y; Maki H; Pai PF; Lopes MA
Am J Vet Res; 2013 Jan; 74(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 23270341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor-based lameness evaluation system for horses.
Keegan KG; Kramer J; Yonezawa Y; Maki H; Pai PF; Dent EV; Kellerman TE; Wilson DA; Reed SK
Am J Vet Res; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1156-63. PubMed ID: 21879972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness.
Keegan KG; MacAllister CG; Wilson DA; Gedon CA; Kramer J; Yonezawa Y; Maki H; Pai PF
Am J Vet Res; 2012 Mar; 73(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 22369528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a wireless, inertial sensor-based system to objectively evaluate flexion tests in the horse.
Marshall JF; Lund DG; Voute LC
Equine Vet J Suppl; 2012 Dec; (43):8-11. PubMed ID: 23447870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of vertical tuber coxae movement in the horse from a single inertial measurement unit.
Pfau T; Starke SD; Tröster S; Roepstorff L
Vet J; 2013 Nov; 198(2):498-503. PubMed ID: 24268482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximal hindlimb flexion in the horse: effect on movement symmetry and implications for defining soundness.
Starke SD; Willems E; Head M; May SA; Pfau T
Equine Vet J; 2012 Nov; 44(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 22563757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of subjective lameness evaluation, force platforms and an inertial-sensor system to identify mild lameness in an equine osteoarthritis model.
Donnell JR; Frisbie DD; King MR; Goodrich LR; Haussler KK
Vet J; 2015 Nov; 206(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 26361749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of subjective evaluation of lameness in horses.
Keegan KG; Dent EV; Wilson DA; Janicek J; Kramer J; Lacarrubba A; Walsh DM; Cassells MW; Esther TM; Schiltz P; Frees KE; Wilhite CL; Clark JM; Pollitt CC; Shaw R; Norris T
Equine Vet J; 2010 Mar; 42(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 20156242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An attempt to detect lameness in galloping horses by use of body-mounted inertial sensors.
Lopes MA; Dearo AC; Lee A; Reed SK; Kramer J; Pai PF; Yonezawa Y; Maki H; Morgan TL; Wilson DA; Keegan KG
Am J Vet Res; 2016 Oct; 77(10):1121-31. PubMed ID: 27668584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement among equine veterinarians and between equine veterinarians and inertial sensor system during clinical examination of hindlimb lameness in horses.
Leelamankong P; Estrada R; Mählmann K; Rungsri P; Lischer C
Equine Vet J; 2020 Mar; 52(2):326-331. PubMed ID: 31233625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rater agreement of visual lameness assessment in horses during lungeing.
Hammarberg M; Egenvall A; Pfau T; Rhodin M
Equine Vet J; 2016 Jan; 48(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25399722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Associations of force plate and body-mounted inertial sensor measurements for identification of hind limb lameness in horses.
Bell RP; Reed SK; Schoonover MJ; Whitfield CT; Yonezawa Y; Maki H; Pai PF; Keegan KG
Am J Vet Res; 2016 Apr; 77(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 27027831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of discriminant analysis based on dorsoventral symmetry indices to quantify hindlimb lameness during over ground locomotion in the horse.
Church EE; Walker AM; Wilson AM; Pfau T
Equine Vet J; 2009 Mar; 41(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 19469241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying optimal parameters for quantification of changes in pelvic movement symmetry as a response to diagnostic analgesia in the hindlimbs of horses.
Pfau T; Spicer-Jenkins C; Smith RK; Bolt DM; Fiske-Jackson A; Witte TH
Equine Vet J; 2014 Nov; 46(6):759-63. PubMed ID: 24329685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of kinetic gait analysis for detection, quantification, and differentiation of hind limb lameness and spinal ataxia in horses.
Ishihara A; Reed SM; Rajala-Schultz PJ; Robertson JT; Bertone AL
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2009 Mar; 234(5):644-51. PubMed ID: 19250044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of sedation on fore- and hindlimb lameness evaluation using body-mounted inertial sensors.
Rettig MJ; Leelamankong P; Rungsri P; Lischer CJ
Equine Vet J; 2016 Sep; 48(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 26032237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a sensor-based system of motion analysis for detection and quantification of forelimb and hind limb lameness in horses.
Keegan KG; Yonezawa Y; Pai PF; Wilson DA; Kramer J
Am J Vet Res; 2004 May; 65(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 15141889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement between accelerometric symmetry scores and clinical lameness scores during experimentally induced transient distension of the metacarpophalangeal joint in horses.
Thomsen MH; Persson AB; Jensen AT; Sørensen H; Andersen PH
Equine Vet J Suppl; 2010 Nov; (38):510-5. PubMed ID: 21059053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of mild hindlimb lameness during over ground locomotion using linear discriminant analysis of inertial sensor data.
Pfau T; Robilliard JJ; Weller R; Jespers K; Eliashar E; Wilson AM
Equine Vet J; 2007 Sep; 39(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 17910264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
