These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22564012)

  • 1. Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments.
    Paunonen SV; LeBel EP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 22564012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What if we fake emotional intelligence? A test of criterion validity attenuation.
    Choi S; Kluemper DH; Sauley KS
    J Pers Assess; 2011 May; 93(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 21516586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL; Kim BH; Gillespie MA; Ramsay LJ; Yoo TY
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):979-88. PubMed ID: 14640810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity.
    Wood JK; Anglim J; Horwood S
    J Pers Assess; 2024; 106(3):372-383. PubMed ID: 37703381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Racial differences in socially desirable responding in selection contexts: magnitude and consequences.
    Dudley NM; McFarland LA; Goodman SA; Hunt ST; Sydell EJ
    J Pers Assess; 2005 Aug; 85(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 16083384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Socially desirable responding on the web: investigating the candor hypothesis.
    Risko EF; Quilty LC; Oakman JM
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Dec; 87(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 17134335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of response style on self-reported Conscientiousness across 20 countries.
    Mõttus R; Allik J; Realo A; Rossier J; Zecca G; Ah-Kion J; Amoussou-Yéyé D; Bäckström M; Barkauskiene R; Barry O; Bhowon U; Björklund F; Bochaver A; Bochaver K; de Bruin G; Cabrera HF; Chen SX; Church AT; Cissé DD; Dahourou D; Feng X; Guan Y; Hwang HS; Idris F; Katigbak MS; Kuppens P; Kwiatkowska A; Laurinavicius A; Mastor KA; Matsumoto D; Riemann R; Schug J; Simpson B; Tseung-Wong CN; Johnson W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1423-36. PubMed ID: 22745332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vividness of visual imagery and social desirable responding: correlations of the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire with the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the Marlowe-Crowne scale.
    Allbutt J; Ling J; Rowley M; Shafiullah M
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):791-9. PubMed ID: 21494918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social desirability and self-reports: testing models of socially desirable responding.
    Holtgraves T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Feb; 30(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 15030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding.
    Stöber J; Dette DE; Musch J
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):370-89. PubMed ID: 12067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].
    Masson AM; Cadot M; Ansseau M
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 14567164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social Desirability in Spouse Ratings.
    Vésteinsdóttir V; Steingrimsdottir ED; Joinson A; Reips UD; Thorsdottir F
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Apr; 122(2):593-608. PubMed ID: 29648502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validating an inventory for the assessment of egoistic bias and moralistic bias as two separable components of social desirability.
    Musch J; Ostapczuk M; Klaiber Y
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):620-9. PubMed ID: 22489614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Socially desirable responding by bariatric surgery candidates during psychological assessment.
    Ambwani S; Boeka AG; Brown JD; Byrne TK; Budak AR; Sarwer DB; Fabricatore AN; Morey LC; O'Neil PM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2013; 9(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 21924688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive assessment of human strivings: test-retest reliability and validity of the Reiss Profile.
    Havercamp SM; Reiss S
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Oct; 81(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12946919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive response distortion by police officer applicants: association of Paulhus Deception Scales With MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory Validity Scales.
    Detrick P; Chibnall JT
    Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 18258735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Meta-Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales.
    Connelly BS; Chang L
    J Pers; 2016 Jun; 84(3):319-34. PubMed ID: 25565409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting DUI recidivism: Personality, attitudinal, and behavioral risk factors.
    Schell TL; Chan KS; Morral AR
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2006 Mar; 82(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 16150554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-reported adherence is more predictive of virological treatment response among patients with a lower tendency towards socially desirable responding.
    Nieuwkerk PT; de Boer-van der Kolk IM; Prins JM; Locadia M; Sprangers MA
    Antivir Ther; 2010; 15(6):913-6. PubMed ID: 20834104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Substance and style in socially desirable responding.
    Lönnqvist JE; Paunonen S; Tuulio-Henriksson A; Lönnqvist J; Verkasalo M
    J Pers; 2007 Apr; 75(2):291-322. PubMed ID: 17359240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.