These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22565267)

  • 1. Economic analysis of best management practices to reduce watershed phosphorus losses.
    Rao NS; Easton ZM; Lee DR; Steenhuis TS
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 22565267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling watershed-scale effectiveness of agricultural best management practices to reduce phosphorus loading.
    Rao NS; Easton ZM; Schneiderman EM; Zion MS; Lee DR; Steenhuis TS
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 90(3):1385-95. PubMed ID: 19008034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined monitoring and modeling indicate the most effective agricultural best management practices.
    Easton ZM; Walter MT; Steenhuis TS
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(5):1798-809. PubMed ID: 18689741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multivariate analysis of paired watershed data to evaluate agricultural best management practice effects on stream water phosphorus.
    Bishop PL; Hively WD; Stedinger JR; Rafferty MR; Lojpersberger JL; Bloomfield JA
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(3):1087-101. PubMed ID: 15888895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling effectiveness of agricultural BMPs to reduce sediment load and organophosphate pesticides in surface runoff.
    Zhang X; Zhang M
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Apr; 409(10):1949-58. PubMed ID: 21377192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating agricultural best management practices in tile-drained subwatersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois.
    Lemke AM; Kirkham KG; Lindenbaum TT; Herbert ME; Tear TH; Perry WL; Herkert JR
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1215-28. PubMed ID: 21712591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrated watershed- and farm-scale modeling framework for targeting critical source areas while maintaining farm economic viability.
    Ghebremichael LT; Veith TL; Hamlett JM
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 114():381-94. PubMed ID: 23195139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the soil and water assessment tool to estimate achievable water quality targets through implementation of beneficial management practices in an agricultural watershed.
    Yang Q; Benoy GA; Chow TL; Daigle JL; Bourque CP; Meng FR
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 22218174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of analytical hierarchy process for effective selection of agricultural best management practices.
    Giri S; Nejadhashemi AP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():165-77. PubMed ID: 24309231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of hydrodynamically rough grassed waterways on dissolved reactive phosphorus loads coming from agricultural watersheds.
    Fiener P; Auerswald K
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(2):548-59. PubMed ID: 19202025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of targeting methods for implementation of best management practices in the Saginaw River Watershed.
    Giri S; Nejadhashemi AP; Woznicki SA
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 103():24-40. PubMed ID: 22459068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing surface water pollution through the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of BMPs at different spatial scales.
    Panagopoulos Y; Makropoulos C; Mimikou M
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2823-35. PubMed ID: 21742430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of multiple beneficial management practices on hydrology and nutrient losses in a small watershed in the Canadian prairies.
    Li S; Elliott JA; Tiessen KH; Yarotski J; Lobb DA; Flaten DN
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(5):1627-42. PubMed ID: 21869525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Water quality effects of clearcut harvesting and forest fertilization with best management practices.
    McBroom MW; Beasley RS; Chang M; Ice GG
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 18178884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of a multi-objective optimization method to provide least cost alternatives for NPS pollution control.
    Maringanti C; Chaubey I; Arabi M; Engel B
    Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 48(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 21667317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating farm to catchment nutrient fluxes using dynamic simulation modelling--can agri-environmental BMPs really do the job?
    Rivers MR; Weaver DM; Smettem KR; Davies PM
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 130():313-23. PubMed ID: 24113535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prioritisation of farm scale remediation efforts for reducing losses of nutrients and faecal indicator organisms to waterways: a case study of New Zealand dairy farming.
    Monaghan RM; de Klein CA; Muirhead RW
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):609-22. PubMed ID: 18164122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agroforestry buffers for nonpoint source pollution reductions from agricultural watersheds.
    Udawatta RP; Garrett HE; Kallenbach R
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(3):800-6. PubMed ID: 21546665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land.
    Dosskey MG
    Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 28(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 11568840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatially-Distributed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Framework to Control Phosphorus from Agricultural Diffuse Pollution.
    Geng R; Wang X; Sharpley AN; Meng F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0130607. PubMed ID: 26313561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.