201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22565603)
21. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Zhong L; Xiao SD; Stoker J; Nj Tytgat G
Chin J Dig Dis; 2004; 5(4):139-48. PubMed ID: 15612882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.
Sahai AV; Devonshire D; Yeoh KG; Kay C; Feldman D; Willner I; Farber J; Patel R; Tamasky PR; Cunningham JT; Trus T; Hawes RH; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Single shot MRI cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a "fast acquisition spin echo" sequence (FASE). Replacement of ERCP?].
Schulte B; Beyer D; Wedekind G; Meuser W
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9538925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography reports in the evaluation of chronic pancreatitis: a need for quality improvement.
Zuccaro P; Stevens T; Repas K; Diamond R; Lopez R; Wu B; Conwell DL
Pancreatology; 2009; 9(6):764-9. PubMed ID: 20110743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pitfalls of MRCP in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction.
Kamisawa T; Okamoto T
JOP; 2004 Nov; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 15536287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Pancreas divisum: Diagnostic importance of MR cholangiopancreatography].
Yağmurlu B; Erden A; Erden I
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 14661601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endoscopic approach to acute pancreatitis.
Kinney TP; Lai R; Freeman ML
Rev Gastroenterol Disord; 2006; 6(3):119-35. PubMed ID: 16957653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation.
Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Matos C; Metens T; Devière J; Delhaye M; Le Moine O; Cremer M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jun; 53(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 11375579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnosis of duct disruption and assessment of pancreatic leak with dynamic secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography.
Gillams AR; Kurzawinski T; Lees WR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 16423959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital.
Rahman R; Ju J; Shamma's J; Goebel S; Sundaram U
W V Med J; 2010; 106(5):14-9. PubMed ID: 21739880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study.
Adamek HE; Albert J; Breer H; Weitz M; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Lancet; 2000 Jul; 356(9225):190-3. PubMed ID: 10963196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis.
Kinney TP; Freeman ML
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol; 2005 Dec; 51(4):265-88. PubMed ID: 16282957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnostic evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis.
Park SH; Kim MH; Kim SY; Kim HJ; Moon SH; Lee SS; Byun JH; Lee SK; Seo DW; Lee MG
Pancreas; 2010 Nov; 39(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 20467343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Normal pancreatic exocrine function does not exclude MRI/MRCP chronic pancreatitis findings.
Alkaade S; Cem Balci N; Momtahen AJ; Burton F
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 42(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 18645530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative assessment of patients with biliary pancreatitis.
De Waele E; Op de Beeck B; De Waele B; Delvaux G
Pancreatology; 2007; 7(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 17703081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL
Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
