BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2256578)

  • 21. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
    Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patch test responses evaluated by cutaneous blood flow measurements.
    Staberg B; Klemp P; Serup J
    Arch Dermatol; 1984 Jun; 120(6):741-3. PubMed ID: 6232901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Suppressive effects of oral ketotifen on skin responses to histamine, codeine, and allergen skin tests.
    Wang SS; Wang SR; Chiang BN
    Ann Allergy; 1985 Jul; 55(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 2409850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The prevalence of positive reactions in the atopy patch test with aeroallergens and food allergens in subjects with atopic eczema: a European multicenter study.
    Darsow U; Laifaoui J; Kerschenlohr K; Wollenberg A; Przybilla B; Wüthrich B; Borelli S; Giusti F; Seidenari S; Drzimalla K; Simon D; Disch R; Borelli S; Devillers AC; Oranje AP; De Raeve L; Hachem JP; Dangoisse C; Blondeel A; Song M; Breuer K; Wulf A; Werfel T; Roul S; Taieb A; Bolhaar S; Bruijnzeel-Koomen C; Brönnimann M; Braathen LR; Didierlaurent A; André C; Ring J
    Allergy; 2004 Dec; 59(12):1318-25. PubMed ID: 15507101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bronchial responsiveness to bakery-derived allergens is strongly dependent on specific skin sensitivity.
    Quirce S; Fernández-Nieto M; Escudero C; Cuesta J; de Las Heras M; Sastre J
    Allergy; 2006 Oct; 61(10):1202-8. PubMed ID: 16942570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of repeated delayed hypersensitivity skin tests on skin-test responses.
    Christou NV; Pietsch JB; Meakins JL
    Can J Surg; 1983 Mar; 26(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 6825002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of three prick test methods with the intradermal test and with the rast in the diagnosis of mite allergy.
    Ménardo JL; Bousquet J; Michel FB
    Ann Allergy; 1982 Apr; 48(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 7073028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Skin test diagnosis of grass pollen allergy with a recombinant hybrid molecule.
    Metz-Favre C; Linhart B; Focke-Tejkl M; Purohit A; de Blay F; Valenta R; Pauli G
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Aug; 120(2):315-21. PubMed ID: 17512042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The "false-positive" patch test reaction].
    Aberer W
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3284734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of interferon-gamma whole blood assay with tuberculin skin test for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection in tuberculosis contacts].
    Oztürk N; Sürücüoğlu S; Ozkütük N; Gazi H; Akçali S; Köroğlu G; Ciçek C
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2007 Apr; 41(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 17682705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Histamine release in skin monitored with the microdialysis technique does not correlate with the weal size induced by cow allergen.
    Horsmanheimo L; Harvima IT; Harvima RJ; Ylönen J; Naukkarinen A; Horsmanheimo M
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Jan; 134(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 8745892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pitfalls in drug allergy skin testing: false-positive reactions due to (hidden) additives.
    Grims RH; Kränke B; Aberer W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 May; 54(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 16689815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens.
    Brasch J; Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A;
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Dec; 12(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 11753892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. House dust mite and cockroach exposure are strong risk factors for positive allergy skin test responses in the Childhood Asthma Management Program.
    Huss K; Adkinson NF; Eggleston PA; Dawson C; Van Natta ML; Hamilton RG
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 Jan; 107(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 11149990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lack of interference in skin tests by histamine in food extracts.
    May CD
    Ann Allergy; 1976 Jul; 37(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 952431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Antigen specific stimulation of immune responses during long-term repeated skin testing with multiple antigens.
    Lesourd BM; Winters WD; Darnell B
    J Clin Lab Immunol; 1986 Sep; 21(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 2433448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the Quintest to the lancet in allergic skin testing.
    Carrozzi FM; Byth K; Katelaris CH
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 1998 Dec; 16(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 10219895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Allergy skin testing: comparison of conventional and new techniques.
    James JM; Simons FE
    Can Med Assoc J; 1979 Feb; 120(3):330-2. PubMed ID: 427671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laser skin testing.
    Kardassakis DG; Grekin RC; LeBoit PE
    Ann Allergy; 1992 Mar; 68(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 1546824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [False positive epicutaneous test caused by dropper (author's transl)].
    Novák M
    Cesk Dermatol; 1978; 53(5):330-1. PubMed ID: 729017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.