These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22566074)

  • 1. Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation.
    Corbeil CR; Williams CI; Labute P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):775-86. PubMed ID: 22566074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application.
    Spitzer R; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):687-99. PubMed ID: 22569590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide.
    Repasky MP; Murphy RB; Banks JL; Greenwood JR; Tubert-Brohman I; Bhat S; Friesner RA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):787-99. PubMed ID: 22576241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.
    Neves MA; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):675-86. PubMed ID: 22569591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.
    Moustakas DT; Lang PT; Pegg S; Pettersen E; Kuntz ID; Brooijmans N; Rizzo RC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006; 20(10-11):601-19. PubMed ID: 17149653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
    Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of GOLD scoring functions in a standardized test.
    Liebeschuetz JW; Cole JC; Korb O
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):737-48. PubMed ID: 22371207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.
    Slynko I; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):669-683. PubMed ID: 27480696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FRED and HYBRID docking performance on standardized datasets.
    McGann M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Aug; 26(8):897-906. PubMed ID: 22669221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. eHiTS: a new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system.
    Zsoldos Z; Reid D; Simon A; Sadjad SB; Johnson AP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):198-212. PubMed ID: 16860582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lead Finder docking and virtual screening evaluation with Astex and DUD test sets.
    Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Zeifman AA; Stroganov OV; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):725-35. PubMed ID: 22569592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
    Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SKATE: a docking program that decouples systematic sampling from scoring.
    Feng JA; Marshall GR
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Nov; 31(14):2540-54. PubMed ID: 20740553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of protein conformation in docking: improved pose prediction through protein pocket adaptation.
    Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2009 Jun; 23(6):355-74. PubMed ID: 19340588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimizing false positives in kinase virtual screens.
    Perola E
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 16708364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.