These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22566366)

  • 21. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are lies more wrong than errors? Accuracy judgments of inaccurate statements.
    Teigen KH; Filkuková P
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 21054418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Group discussion improves lie detection.
    Klein N; Epley N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7460-5. PubMed ID: 26015581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hemispheric asymmetry and deception detection.
    Malcolm S; Paul Keenan J
    Laterality; 2005 Mar; 10(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 15849029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.
    Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 14769126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
    O'Sullivan M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judging the accuracy of children's recall: a statement-level analysis.
    Ball CT; O'Callaghan J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Dec; 7(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 11838895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When victims don't cry: children's understandings of victimization, compliance, and subversion.
    Shaw LA; Wainryb C
    Child Dev; 2006; 77(4):1050-62. PubMed ID: 16942505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. "Intuitive" lie detection of children's deception by law enforcement officials and university students.
    Leach AM; Talwar V; Lee K; Bala N; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):661-85. PubMed ID: 15732652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception?
    Kozel FA; Johnson KA; Laken SJ; Grenesko EL; Smith JA; Walker J; George MS
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 18633826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speaking of secrets and lies: the contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception.
    Spence SA; Kaylor-Hughes C; Farrow TF; Wilkinson ID
    Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(3):1411-8. PubMed ID: 18308586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. You must be lying because I don't understand you: Language proficiency and lie detection.
    Elliott E; Leach AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Dec; 22(4):488-499. PubMed ID: 27936858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil's Advocate approach as a lie detection aid.
    Leal S; Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 20398882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. To lie or not to lie: to whom and under what circumstances.
    Perkins SA; Turiel E
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(2):609-21. PubMed ID: 17381793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. fMRI investigation of the cognitive structure of the Concealed Information Test.
    Hakun JG; Seelig D; Ruparel K; Loughead JW; Busch E; Gur RC; Langleben DD
    Neurocase; 2008; 14(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 18569732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does parental coaching affect children's false reports? Comparing verbal markers of deception.
    Talwar V; Hubbard K; Saykaly C; Lee K; Lindsay RCL; Bala N
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):84-97. PubMed ID: 29460438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.