These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22567120)

  • 1. DNA barcoding simplifies environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in biodiverse regions.
    Nzeduru CV; Ronca S; Wilkinson MJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e35929. PubMed ID: 22567120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy.
    Kumar S; Chandra A; Pandey KC
    J Environ Biol; 2008 Sep; 29(5):641-53. PubMed ID: 19295059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk assessment and ecological effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops on non-target organisms.
    Yu HL; Li YH; Wu KM
    J Integr Plant Biol; 2011 Jul; 53(7):520-38. PubMed ID: 21564541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The distinct properties of natural and GM cry insecticidal proteins.
    Latham JR; Love M; Hilbeck A
    Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev; 2017 Apr; 33(1):62-96. PubMed ID: 28901209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk assessment of Bt crops on the non-target plant-associated insects and soil organisms.
    Yaqoob A; Shahid AA; Samiullah TR; Rao AQ; Khan MA; Tahir S; Mirza SA; Husnain T
    J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Jun; 96(8):2613-9. PubMed ID: 26857894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulatory considerations surrounding the deployment of Bt-expressing cowpea in Africa: report of the deliberations of an expert panel.
    Huesing J; Romeis J; Ellstrand N; Raybould A; Hellmich R; Wolt J; Ehlers J; Dabiré C; Fatokun C; Hokanson K; Ishiyaku MF; Margam V; Obokoh N; Mignouna J; Nangayo F; Ouedraogo J; Pasquet R; Pittendrigh B; Schaal B; Stein J; Tamò M; Murdock L
    GM Crops; 2011; 2(3):211-24. PubMed ID: 22179194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future.
    Lacey LA; Grzywacz D; Shapiro-Ilan DI; Frutos R; Brownbridge M; Goettel MS
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2015 Nov; 132():1-41. PubMed ID: 26225455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of potential adjuvanticity of Cry proteins.
    Joshi SS; Barnett B; Doerrer NG; Glenn K; Herman RA; Herouet-Guicheney C; Hunst P; Kough J; Ladics GS; McClain S; Papineni S; Poulsen LK; Rascle JB; Tao AL; van Ree R; Ward J; Bowman CC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 79():149-155. PubMed ID: 27105772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pest control and resistance management through release of insects carrying a male-selecting transgene.
    Harvey-Samuel T; Morrison NI; Walker AS; Marubbi T; Yao J; Collins HL; Gorman K; Davies TG; Alphey N; Warner S; Shelton AM; Alphey L
    BMC Biol; 2015 Jul; 13():49. PubMed ID: 26179401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of secondary pests on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops.
    Catarino R; Ceddia G; Areal FJ; Park J
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Jun; 13(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 25832330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insecticidal Activity of
    Domínguez-Arrizabalaga M; Villanueva M; Escriche B; Ancín-Azpilicueta C; Caballero P
    Toxins (Basel); 2020 Jun; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 32610662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relevance of Bt toxin interaction studies for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops.
    De Schrijver A; De Clercq P; de Maagd RA; van Frankenhuyzen K
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Dec; 13(9):1221-3. PubMed ID: 26032006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bt transgenic crops do not have favorable effects on resistant insects.
    Tabashnik BE; Carrière Y
    J Insect Sci; 2004; 4():4. PubMed ID: 15861220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bt crops: predicting effects of escaped transgenes on the fitness of wild plants and their herbivores.
    Letourneau DK; Robinson GS; Hagen JA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(4):219-46. PubMed ID: 15612280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future.
    Bates SL; Zhao JZ; Roush RT; Shelton AM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 15637622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current trends in Bt crops and their fate on associated microbial community dynamics: a review.
    Singh AK; Dubey SK
    Protoplasma; 2016 May; 253(3):663-681. PubMed ID: 26560114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-target organism effects tests on Vip3A and their application to the ecological risk assessment for cultivation of MIR162 maize.
    Raybould A; Vlachos D
    Transgenic Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):599-611. PubMed ID: 20839052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent progress on the interaction between insects and Bacillus thuringiensis crops.
    Xiao Y; Wu K
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1767):20180316. PubMed ID: 30967027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plant fitness assessment for wild relatives of insect resistant crops.
    Letourneau DK; Hagen JA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2009; 8(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 19419653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. eCry1Gb.1Ig, A Novel Chimeric Cry Protein with High Efficacy against Multiple Fall Armyworm (
    Chae H; Wen Z; Hootman T; Himes J; Duan Q; McMath J; Ditillo J; Sessler R; Conville J; Niu Y; Matthews P; Francischini F; Huang F; Bramlett M
    Toxins (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 36548749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.