These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22567744)

  • 1. Acute-phase response in pigs undergoing laparoscopic, transgastric or transcolonic notes peritoneoscopy with us or eus exploration.
    Navez J; Yeung R; Remue C; Descamps C; Navez B; Gigot JF; Starkel P; Philippe M; Jouret-Mourin A; Van de Weerdt ML; Zech F; Gianello P; Deprez PH
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2012 Mar; 75(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 22567744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Late phase TNF-alpha depression in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy.
    McGee MF; Schomisch SJ; Marks JM; Delaney CP; Jin J; Williams C; Chak A; Matteson DT; Andrews J; Ponsky JL
    Surgery; 2008 Mar; 143(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 18291252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal EUS.
    Voermans RP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Bemelman WA; Fockens P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):e61-7. PubMed ID: 19481644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-demand endoscopic CO2 insufflation with feedback pressure regulation during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy induces minimal hemodynamic and respiratory changes.
    Navarro-Ripoll R; Martínez-Pallí G; Guarner-Argente C; Córdova H; Martínez-Zamora MA; Comas J; Rodríguez de Miguel C; Beltrán M; Rodríguez-D'Jesús A; Hernández-Cera C; Llach J; Balust J; Fernández-Esparrach G
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 22817790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pulmonary and peritoneal inflammatory findings in transgastric NOTES compared with laparoscopy: pooled analysis from randomized porcine survival studies.
    Moran E; Hanes M; Huebner M; Gostout CJ; Bingener J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Nov; 74(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 21890136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of transcolonic NOTES and laparoscopic peritoneoscopy for the detection of peritoneal metastases.
    Voermans RP; Faigel DO; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Sheppard B; Fockens P
    Endoscopy; 2010 Nov; 42(11):904-9. PubMed ID: 21072705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison in efficacy between pure NOTES peritoneoscopy with small or large endoscope and laparoscopy.
    Wang ZK; Yang YS; Zhang XL; Sun G; Hyder Q; Wu LL; Tang P; Li W
    J Dig Dis; 2014 Nov; 15(11):628-35. PubMed ID: 25244524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model.
    Guarner-Argente C; Beltrán M; Martínez-Pallí G; Navarro-Ripoll R; Martínez-Zamora MÀ; Córdova H; Comas J; de Miguel CR; Rodríguez-D'Jesús A; Almela M; Hernández-Cera C; Lacy AM; Fernández-Esparrach G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 22024260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transgastric pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of gastrointestinal cancers: a survival and feasibility study.
    Donatsky AM; Vilmann P; Meisner S; Jørgensen LN; Rosenberg J
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Jun; 26(6):1629-36. PubMed ID: 22179468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adhesion formation after peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy in a survival porcine model: comparison of laparotomy, laparoscopy, and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).
    Dubcenco E; Assumpcao L; Dray X; Gabrielson KL; Ruben DS; Pipitone LJ; Donatelli G; Krishnamurty DM; Baker JP; Marohn MR; Kalloo AN
    Endoscopy; 2009 Nov; 41(11):971-8. PubMed ID: 19866395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immunologic parameters during NOTES compared with laparoscopy in a randomized blinded porcine trial.
    Bingener J; Krishnegowda NK; Michalek JE
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):178-81. PubMed ID: 18813979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct incision versus submucosal tunneling as a method of creating transgastric accesses for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy: randomized controlled trial.
    Teoh AY; Chiu PW; Chan SM; Wong TC; Lau JY; Ng EK
    Dig Endosc; 2013 May; 25(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 23368513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inflammatory impact of NOTES peritoneoscopy is not different from that of laparoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model.
    Guarner-Argente C; Martínez-Pallí G; Navarro-Ripoll R; Córdova H; Beltrán M; Martínez-Zamora MA; Comas J; de Miguel CR; Rodríguez-D'Jesús A; Filella X; Hernández-Cera C; Lacy AM; Thompson CC; Fernández-Esparrach G
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Feb; 26(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 21898015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized trial comparing rates of abdominal contamination and postoperative infection among natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and open surgery in pigs.
    Azadani A; Jonsson H; Park PO; Bergström M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):849-55. PubMed ID: 22284088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison with standard laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum.
    von Delius S; Sager J; Feussner H; Wilhelm D; Thies P; Huber W; Schuster T; Schneider A; Schmid RM; Meining A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):161-9, 169.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20381043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: complications and inflammatory response.
    Martínek J; Ryska O; Filípková T; Doležel R; Juhas S; Motlík J; Holubová M; Nosek V; Rotnáglová B; Zavoral M; Ryska M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(27):3558-64. PubMed ID: 22826620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical Trauma Caused by Different Abdominal Access Routes-Comparison of Open Surgical, Laparoscopic, and NOTES Transgastric Techniques in a Porcine Model.
    Arroyo Vázquez J; Bergström M; Dot J; Abu-Suboh-Abadia M; Fonseca C; Esteves M; Azadani A; Armengol J; Masachs M; Armengol-Miró JR; Park PO
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Jul; 26(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 27163486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approaches: results of a blinded, randomized controlled porcine study.
    von Renteln D; Gutmann TE; Schmidt A; Vassiliou MC; Rudolph HU; Caca K
    Endoscopy; 2012 Jun; 44(6):596-604. PubMed ID: 22402984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of NOTES rectosigmoidectomy in a swine model: E-NOTES vs. P-NOTES.
    Sohn DK; Jeong SY; Park JW; Kim JS; Hwang JH; Kim DW; Kang SB; Oh JH
    Endoscopy; 2011 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 21425040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress response and well-being after open, laparoscopic, and NOTES transgastric uterine horn resection in a randomized porcine model.
    Bergström M; Azadani A; Falk P; Park PO
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2421-7. PubMed ID: 24619329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.