These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Comparison of Inflammatory Response to Transgastric and Transcolonic NOTES. Hucl T; Benes M; Kocik M; Splichalova A; Maluskova J; Krak M; Lanska V; Heczkova M; Kieslichova E; Oliverius M; Spicak J Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2016; 2016():7320275. PubMed ID: 27403157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transcolonic peritoneoscopy by using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap for the detection of peritoneal bead targeting in the porcine survival model: a feasibility and effectiveness study. Takizawa K; Brahmbhatt R; Knipschield MA; Bingener J; Gostout CJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Jan; 79(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 23932093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Acute inflammatory response to transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy: an experimental study in swine. Rezende M; Montero EF; Salomão R; Brunialti M; Rodrigues R; Gomes G; Libera AD; Ferrari A; Libera ED Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2013 Nov; 68(11):1433-9. PubMed ID: 24270956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Specialized instrumentation facilitates stable peritoneal access, gastric decompression, and visualization during transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy. Perry KA; Shah N; Memark V; Nau P; Needleman BJ; Hazey JW Surg Innov; 2013 Jun; 20(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 22858574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessing transgastric Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery prior to clinical implementation. Donatsky AM Dan Med J; 2014 Aug; 61(8):B4903. PubMed ID: 25162448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model. Fong DG; Pai RD; Thompson CC Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Feb; 65(2):312-8. PubMed ID: 17173916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The development of a novel intracolonic occlusion balloon for transcolonic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: description of the technique and early experience in a porcine model (with videos). Dubcenco E; Grantcharov T; Streutker CJ; Rotstein OD; Baxter NN; Jeejeebhoy KN; Baker JP Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Oct; 68(4):760-6. PubMed ID: 18926184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Safety and efficacy of the submucosal tunnel without mucosal closure for the transgastric approach in a porcine survival model. Akagi T; Yasuda K; Kono Y; Suzuki K; Kawaguchi K; Yoshizumi F; Inomata M; Shiraishi N; Kitano S Surg Innov; 2012 Dec; 19(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 22333937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic transgastric flexible peritoneoscopy: is pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery a fantasy? Hyder Q; Zahid MA; Ahmad W; Rashid R; Hadi SF; Qazi S; Haider HK Singapore Med J; 2008 Dec; 49(12):e375-81. PubMed ID: 19122940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility of fibrin glue versus endoclips to close the transgastric peritoneal access site in NOTES in a survival porcine study. Yoshizumi F; Yasuda K; Suzuki K; Kawaguchi K; Inomata M; Shiraishi N; Kitano S Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 May; 4(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 22776225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Air and fluid leak tests after NOTES procedures: a pilot study in a live porcine model (with videos). Dray X; Gabrielson KL; Buscaglia JM; Shin EJ; Giday SA; Surti VC; Assumpcao L; Marohn MR; Magno P; Pipitone LJ; Redding SK; Kalloo AN; Kantsevoy SV Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Sep; 68(3):513-9. PubMed ID: 18402950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not require decontamination of the stomach in humans. Narula VK; Happel LC; Volt K; Bergman S; Roland JC; Dettorre R; Renton DB; Reavis KM; Needleman BJ; Mikami DJ; Ellison EC; Melvin WS; Hazey JW Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1331-6. PubMed ID: 18855060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Forward-viewing endoscopic ultrasound-guided NOTES interventions: a study on peritoneoscopic potential. Jeong SU; Aizan H; Song TJ; Seo DW; Kim SH; Park DH; Lee SS; Lee SK; Kim MH World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Nov; 19(41):7160-7. PubMed ID: 24222961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of transgastric peritoneal access on peritoneal innate cellular immunity: experimental study in swine. Rodrigues R; Rezende M; Gomes G; Souza F; Blagitz M; Libera AD; Taha M; Ferrari A; Libera ED Surg Endosc; 2013 Mar; 27(3):964-70. PubMed ID: 23239288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Randomized trial on the physiologic impact of NOTES. Bingener J; Loomis EA; Huebner M; Gostout CJ Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3551-8. PubMed ID: 25698397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Infectious implications in the porcine model of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with PEG-tube closure: a quantitative bacteriologic study. McGee MF; Marks JM; Onders RP; Chak A; Rosen MJ; Williams CP; Jin J; Schomisch SJ; Ponsky JL; Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Aug; 68(2):310-8. PubMed ID: 18407267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial experience from the transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy and biopsy: a stepwise approach from the laboratory to clinical application. Zheng Y; Wang D; Kong X; Chen D; Wu R; Yang L; Yu E; Zheng C; Li Z J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 May; 26(5):888-93. PubMed ID: 21251061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Natural orifice versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a porcine model: a randomized, controlled trial. Willingham FF; Gee DW; Sylla P; Kambadakone A; Singh AH; Sahani D; Mino-Kenudson M; Rattner DW; Brugge WR Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Oct; 70(4):740-7. PubMed ID: 19560766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]