These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22567834)
21. Global shape recognition is modulated by the spatial distance of local elements--evidence from simultanagnosia. Huberle E; Karnath HO Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):905-11. PubMed ID: 16226773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Are objects the same as groups? ERP correlates of spatial attentional guidance by irrelevant feature similarity. Kasai T; Moriya H; Hirano S Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():49-58. PubMed ID: 21652032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Horizontal and vertical asymmetry in visual spatial crowding effects. Feng C; Jiang Y; He S J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(2):13.1-10. PubMed ID: 18217828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing. Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Visual object recognition and attention in Parkinson's disease patients with visual hallucinations. Meppelink AM; Koerts J; Borg M; Leenders KL; van Laar T Mov Disord; 2008 Oct; 23(13):1906-12. PubMed ID: 18709671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of viewing time, fixations, and viewing strategies on visual memory for briefly presented natural objects. Huebner GM; Gegenfurtner KR Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1398-413. PubMed ID: 20043271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects. Saneyoshi A; Michimata C Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19800727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size. Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects. Foulsham T; Underwood G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection. Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is there brief temporal buffering of successive visual inputs? Smith WS; Mollon JD; Bhardwaj R; Smithson HE Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):767-91. PubMed ID: 21462092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Priming by the mean representation of a set. Marchant AP; de Fockert JW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1889-95. PubMed ID: 19418381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects. Walker S; Stafford P; Davis G J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):21.1-12. PubMed ID: 18484860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of crowding on orientation-selective adaptation in human early visual cortex. Bi T; Cai P; Zhou T; Fang F J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):13.1-10. PubMed ID: 20053076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit? Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of context in object recognition. Oliva A; Torralba A Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Dec; 11(12):520-7. PubMed ID: 18024143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]