BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22568482)

  • 41. Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
    Martinez-Huedo MA; Lopez de Andres A; Hernandez-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Martinez Hernandez D; Jiménez-Garcia R
    Diabetes Metab; 2012 Apr; 38(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 22078638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Of what significance is abnormal result of smear test? Anxiety because of insufficient information in connection with abnormal result of cervical smear test].
    Björk S; Hagström HG
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jun; 98(23):2796-800. PubMed ID: 11462273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prevalence and predicting factors for anxiety in thai women with abnormal cervical cytology undergoing colposcopy.
    Jerachotechueantaveechai T; Charoenkwan K; Wongpakaran N
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(4):1427-30. PubMed ID: 25743810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study.
    Wong LP; Wong YL; Low WY; Khoo EM; Shuib R
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Jan; 50(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 19224084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Perceived barriers to taking a Pap smear: predictors in immigrant women].
    Wu SJ; Tsai SH; Tseng HF; Huang YY; Wang YH; Lin SY
    Hu Li Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 57(5):36-46. PubMed ID: 20878609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Qualitative insights into the psychological stress before and during colposcopy: a focus group study.
    Bosgraaf RP; de Jager WC; Servaes P; Prins JB; Massuger LF; Bekkers RL
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Dec; 34(4):150-6. PubMed ID: 24188786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Opinions of the Urban Women on Pap test: Evidence from Bangladesh.
    Mustari S; Hossain B; Diah NM; Kar S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1613-1620. PubMed ID: 31244279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Harms of cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands.
    Habbema D; Weinmann S; Arbyn M; Kamineni A; Williams AE; M C M de Kok I; van Kemenade F; Field TS; van Rosmalen J; Brown ML
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 140(5):1215-1222. PubMed ID: 27864938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study.
    Broberg G; Wang J; Östberg AL; Adolfsson A; Nemes S; Sparén P; Strander B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190171. PubMed ID: 29320536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Knowledge and intentions regarding the Pap smear test among Saudi Arabian women.
    Alissa NA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253850. PubMed ID: 34166452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Barriers to cervical screening among Pacific women in a New Zealand Urban Population.
    Foliaki S; Matheson A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(4):1565-70. PubMed ID: 25743832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Notification of an abnormal Pap smear result: An intervention study.
    Rask M; Swahnberg K; Oscarsson M
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Mar; 28(2):e12969. PubMed ID: 30457186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The coverage of cervical cancer screening in Khon Kaen, northeast Thailand.
    Kritpetcharat O; Suwanrungruang K; Sriamporn S; Kamsa-Ard S; Kritpetcharat P; Pengsaa P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2003; 4(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 12875621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison of cervical cancer screening rates among women with traumatic spinal cord injury and the general population.
    Guilcher SJ; Newman A; Jaglal SB
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2010 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20088659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants
    Kirkøen B; Berstad P; Botteri E; Bernklev L; El-Safadi B; Hoff G; de Lange T; Bernklev T
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 22(43):9631-9641. PubMed ID: 27920484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in Serbian women with abnormal Papanicolaou smear results.
    Ilic I; Babic G; Dimitrijevic A; Ilic M; Sipetic Grujicic S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):996-1002. PubMed ID: 31203200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Psychological side-effects of the mass screening on cervical cancer.
    Reelick NF; de Haes WF; Schuurman JH
    Soc Sci Med; 1984; 18(12):1089-93. PubMed ID: 6463677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of Group Training Based on the Health Belief Model on Knowledge and Behavior Regarding the Pap Smear Test in Iranian Women: a Quasi-Experimental Study.
    Shobeiri F; Javad MT; Parsa P; Roshanaei G
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(6):2871-6. PubMed ID: 27356705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exploring Effective Contextual Factors for Regular Cervical Cancer Screening in Iranian Women: A Qualitative Study.
    Refaei M; Dehghan Nayeri N; Khakbazan Z; Yazdkhasti M; Shayan A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):533-539. PubMed ID: 29480997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Women with abnormal Pap smear result: a qualitative study of Swedish healthcare professionals' experiences.
    Rask M; Oscarsson M; Lindell G; Swahnberg K
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2016 Nov; 25(6):980-991. PubMed ID: 26545562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.