218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22568535)
1. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables.
Li CH
Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):369-87. PubMed ID: 27571021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
Nestler S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables.
Li CH
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2191-2213. PubMed ID: 33791955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.
Rhemtulla M; Brosseau-Liard PÉ; Savalei V
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):354-73. PubMed ID: 22799625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More efficient parameter estimates for factor analysis of ordinal variables by ridge generalized least squares.
Yuan KH; Jiang G; Cheng Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):525-564. PubMed ID: 28547838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
Xia Y; Yang Y
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):731-755. PubMed ID: 30477318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.
Xia Y; Yang Y
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):409-428. PubMed ID: 29869222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
Li CH
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysing multitrait-multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator: what sample size is needed for valid results?
Nussbeck FW; Eid M; Lischetzke T
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):195-213. PubMed ID: 16709286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modelling.
Yuan KH; Bentler PM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1998 Nov; 51 ( Pt 2)():289-309. PubMed ID: 9854947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
Magis D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 24016181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables.
Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F; Bollen KA
Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):564-594. PubMed ID: 34097200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On mean-sigma estimators and bias.
Baldwin P
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 22571589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
Chan W; Chan DW
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust model fitting for the non linear structural equation model under normal theory.
Xia YM; Song XY; Lee SY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):529-68. PubMed ID: 19040790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
Enders CK
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Homogeneity test of rate ratios in stratified matched-pair studies.
Li HQ; Tang NS
Biom J; 2011 Jul; 53(4):614-27. PubMed ID: 21608010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
