698 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22568699)
1. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Rammelsberg P; Schwarz S; Schroeder C; Bermejo JL; Gabbert O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):758-62. PubMed ID: 22568699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Sailer I; Strasding M; Valente NA; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():184-198. PubMed ID: 30328185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Metal-Ceramic and All-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nicolaisen MH; Bahrami G; Schropp L; Isidor F
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 27148986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival and chipping of zirconia-based and metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
Schwarz S; Schröder C; Hassel A; Bömicke W; Rammelsberg P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e119-25. PubMed ID: 21985745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term chipping and failure rates of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported metal-ceramic and ceramic fixed dental prostheses: A cohort study.
Rammelsberg P; Meyer A; Lorenzo-Bermejo J; Kappel S; Zenthöfer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 32800577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective comparison of semipermanent and permanent cementation of implant-supported single crowns and FDPs with regard to the incidence of survival and complications.
Schwarz S; Schröder C; Corcodel N; Hassel AJ; Rammelsberg P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e151-8. PubMed ID: 22081988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized clinical trial of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: preliminary results.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Clark AE; Shuster JJ; Anusavice KJ
J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 23758092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early complications and short-term failures of zirconia single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses.
Pihlaja J; Näpänkangas R; Raustia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):778-83. PubMed ID: 24840907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of zirconia based tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: 3-year results.
Konstantinidis IK; Jacoby S; Rädel M; Böning K
J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 25446240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical complications and failures of zirconia-based prostheses supported by implants followed up to 7 years: a case series.
Kolgeci L; Mericske E; Worni A; Walker P; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):544-52. PubMed ID: 25390869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.
Mangano F; Macchi A; Caprioglio A; Sammons RL; Piattelli A; Mangano C
J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 24750435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Veneered zirconia inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses: 10-Year results from a prospective clinical study.
Rathmann F; Bömicke W; Rammelsberg P; Ohlmann B
J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():68-72. PubMed ID: 28647157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aesthetic functional area protection concept for prevention of ceramic chipping with zirconia frameworks.
Broseghini C; Broseghini M; Gracis S; Vigolo P
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 24596918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design.
Boemicke W; Kappel S; Stober T; Rammelsberg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24912399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of zirconia ceramic cantilever fixed dental prostheses: 3-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study.
Zenthöfer A; Ohlmann B; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25882973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture analysis of randomized implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Mehler A; Clark AE; Neal D; Anusavice KJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1335-42. PubMed ID: 25016139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study.
Koenig V; Vanheusden AJ; Le Goff SO; Mainjot AK
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1164-74. PubMed ID: 24135294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review.
Le M; Papia E; Larsson C
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 42(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 25580846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
