260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22569838)
1. Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
Başkent D
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 22569838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
Benard MR; Başkent D
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitch and spectral resolution: A systematic comparison of bottom-up cues for top-down repair of degraded speech.
Clarke J; Başkent D; Gaudrain E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):395-405. PubMed ID: 26827034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptual learning of temporally interrupted spectrally degraded speech.
Benard MR; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1344. PubMed ID: 25190407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic simulation of cochlear implant hearing: Effect of manipulating various acoustic parameters on intelligibility of speech.
Jain S; Vipin Ghosh PG
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jan; 19(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29032744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual restoration of degraded speech is preserved with advancing age.
Saija JD; Akyürek EG; Andringa TC; Başkent D
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 15(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 24198087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.
Helms Tillery K; Brown CA; Bacon SP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):416-23. PubMed ID: 22280603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Moore AN
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
Başkent D; Chatterjee M
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age effects on perceptual restoration of degraded interrupted sentences.
Jaekel BN; Newman RS; Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):84. PubMed ID: 29390768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phonemic restoration in sensorineural hearing loss does not depend on baseline speech perception scores.
Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):EL169-74. PubMed ID: 20968321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Zeng FG; Liu S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
