These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22570356)

  • 1. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary interventions in Washington State.
    Bradley SM; Maynard C; Bryson CL
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 22570356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appropriateness ratings of percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and its association with the trend of noninvasive testing.
    Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Miyata H; Ueda I; Ishikawa S; Ohki T; Nishi Y; Hayashida K; Maekawa Y; Kawamura A; Higashi T; Fukuda K
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Sep; 7(9):1000-9. PubMed ID: 25234672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Chan PS; Patel MR; Klein LW; Krone RJ; Dehmer GJ; Kennedy K; Nallamothu BK; Weaver WD; Masoudi FA; Rumsfeld JS; Brindis RG; Spertus JA
    JAMA; 2011 Jul; 306(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 21730241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-year survival after percutaneous coronary intervention according to appropriateness criteria for revascularization.
    Brener SJ; Haq SA; Bose S; Sacchi TJ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 21(11):554-7. PubMed ID: 19901407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-World Use and Appropriateness of Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusion (from a Japanese Multicenter Registry).
    Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Miyata H; Ueda I; Hayashida K; Maekawa Y; Kawamura A; Numasawa Y; Suzuki M; Noma S; Nishi Y; Fukuda K
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 116(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 26183792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Desai NR; Bradley SM; Parzynski CS; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Patel MR; Ader J; Soufer A; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP
    JAMA; 2015 Nov; 314(19):2045-53. PubMed ID: 26551163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appropriateness of coronary interventions in Japan by the US and Japanese standards.
    Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Miyata H; Ueda I; Noma S; Suzuki M; Negishi K; Endo A; Nishi Y; Hayashida K; Maekawa Y; Kawamura A; Higashi T; Fukuda K
    Am Heart J; 2014 Dec; 168(6):854-61.e11. PubMed ID: 25458648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of a real-time appropriate use criteria decision support application for percutaneous coronary interventions in non-acute coronary syndrome.
    Chen SH; Ho KK; Gannon SA; Thyagarajan B; Chakrabarti AK; Potter BJ; Singla A; Piccirillo BJ; Meduri CU; Cutlip DE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 88(3):E74-9. PubMed ID: 26699241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regional and hospital variations in the extent of decline in the proportion of percutaneous coronary interventions performed for nonacute indications - a nationwide population-based study.
    Liang FW; Lu TH; Wu HM; Lee JC; Yin WH
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jun; 17(1):149. PubMed ID: 28599642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States.
    Thomas MP; Parzynski CS; Curtis JP; Seth M; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Patel MR; Bradley SM; Gurm HS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138251. PubMed ID: 26379053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness and in-hospital procedural outcomes: insights from the NCDR.
    Bradley SM; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Kennedy KF; Douglas PS; Patel MR; Anderson HV; Ting HH; Rumsfeld JS; Nallamothu BK
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 May; 5(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 22576845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appropriateness of coronary revascularization for patients without acute coronary syndromes.
    Hannan EL; Cozzens K; Samadashvili Z; Walford G; Jacobs AK; Holmes DR; Stamato NJ; Sharma S; Venditti FJ; Fergus I; King SB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1870-6. PubMed ID: 22595405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appropriate coronary artery bypass grafting use in the percutaneous coronary intervention era: are we finally making progress?
    Osnabrugge RL; Head SJ; Bogers AJ; Kappetein AP
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012; 24(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 23465670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of changes in clinical practice guidelines on assessment of quality of care.
    Lin GA; Redberg RF; Anderson HV; Shaw RE; Milford-Beland S; Peterson ED; Rao SV; Werner RM; Dudley RA
    Med Care; 2010 Aug; 48(8):733-8. PubMed ID: 20613660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in Coded Indications for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Medicare and the Veterans Affairs After Implementation of Hospital-Level Reporting of Appropriate Use Criteria.
    Dayoub EJ; Nathan AS; Khatana SAM; Wadhera RK; Kolansky DM; Yeh RW; Giri J; Groeneveld PW
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 14(4):e006887. PubMed ID: 33719490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State and Ontario.
    Ko DT; Tu JV; Samadashvili Z; Guo H; Alter DA; Cantor WJ; Hannan EL
    Circulation; 2010 Jun; 121(24):2635-44. PubMed ID: 20529997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The appropriateness of colonoscopies at a teaching hospital: magnitude, associated factors, and comparison of EPAGE and EPAGE-II criteria.
    Argüello L; Pertejo V; Ponce M; Peiró S; Garrigues V; Ponce J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 22100299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals From 2013 to 2015.
    Hess PL; Kini V; Liu W; Roldan P; Autruong P; Grunwald GK; O'Donnell C; Doll JA; Ho PM; Bradley SM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e203144. PubMed ID: 32315067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional variation in cardiac catheterization appropriateness and baseline risk after acute myocardial infarction.
    Ko DT; Wang Y; Alter DA; Curtis JP; Rathore SS; Stukel TA; Masoudi FA; Ross JS; Foody JM; Krumholz HM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Feb; 51(7):716-23. PubMed ID: 18279735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of cardiac computed tomography examination appropriateness under the 2010 revised versus the 2006 original Appropriate Use Criteria.
    Wasfy MM; Brady TJ; Abbara S; Nasir K; Hoffmann U; Cury RC; Di Carli MF; Blankstein R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 22440425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.