These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22570895)

  • 1. Effect of animal welfare audits of slaughter plants by a major fast food company on cattle handling and stunning practices.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2000 Mar; 216(6):848-51. PubMed ID: 22570895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective scoring of animal handling and stunning practices at slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1998 Jan; 212(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 9426775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 Nov; 221(9):1258-61. PubMed ID: 12418689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of animal welfare issues during Chinese transport and slaughter of livestock by a sample of stakeholders in the industry.
    Li X; Zito S; Sinclair M; Phillips CJC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197028. PubMed ID: 29933370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditing animal welfare at slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 20599326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solving return-to-sensibility problems after electrical stunning in commercial pork slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2001 Sep; 219(5):608-11. PubMed ID: 11549087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods.
    Neves JE; Paranhos da Costa MJ; Roça RO; Faucitano L; Gregory NG
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():41-3. PubMed ID: 26946474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Animal welfare in the U.S. slaughter industry-a focus on fed cattle.
    Edwards-Callaway LN; Calvo-Lorenzo MS
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32026929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Head-only followed by cardiac arrest electrical stunning is an effective alternative to head-only electrical stunning in pigs.
    Vogel KD; Badtram G; Claus JR; Grandin T; Turpin S; Weyker RE; Voogd E
    J Anim Sci; 2011 May; 89(5):1412-8. PubMed ID: 21183712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cattle stunning with a penetrative captive bolt device: A review.
    Kamenik J; Paral V; Pyszko M; Voslarova E
    Anim Sci J; 2019 Mar; 90(3):307-316. PubMed ID: 30669179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of cattle welfare at a commercial slaughter plant in the northwest of Mexico.
    Miranda-de la Lama GC; Leyva IG; Barreras-Serrano A; Pérez-Linares C; Sánchez-López E; María GA; Figueroa-Saavedra F
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2012 Mar; 44(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 21789548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of indicators used to assess unconsciousness in veal calves at slaughter.
    Verhoeven MT; Gerritzen MA; Hellebrekers LJ; Kemp B
    Animal; 2016 Sep; 10(9):1457-65. PubMed ID: 26965337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning - a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions.
    Fries R; Schrohe K; Lotz F; Arndt G
    Animal; 2012 Jul; 6(7):1124-8. PubMed ID: 23031473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making slaughterhouses more humane for cattle, pigs, and sheep.
    Grandin T
    Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2013 Jan; 1():491-512. PubMed ID: 25387029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of a newly designed double-barreled bullet-shooting stunner for adequate stunning of water buffaloes.
    Gascho D; Stephan R; Bauer C; Oesch MA; Richter H
    Meat Sci; 2022 Nov; 193():108933. PubMed ID: 35961127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Welfare indicators for stunning versus non-stunning slaughter in sheep and cattle: A scoping review.
    Tetlow SAJ; Brennan ML; Garcia-Ara A
    Vet Rec; 2022 Sep; 191(6):e1739. PubMed ID: 35779274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The perception and acceptability of pre-slaughter and post-slaughter stunning for Halal production: The views of UK Islamic scholars and Halal consumers.
    Fuseini A; Wotton SB; Hadley PJ; Knowles TG
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jan; 123():143-150. PubMed ID: 27716560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre-slaughter cattle welfare indicators for use in commercial abattoirs with voluntary monitoring systems: A systematic review.
    Losada-Espinosa N; Villarroel M; María GA; Miranda-de la Lama GC
    Meat Sci; 2018 Apr; 138():34-48. PubMed ID: 29291504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On-farm conditions that compromise animal welfare that can be monitored at the slaughter plant.
    Grandin T
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():52-58. PubMed ID: 28579088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of nonpenetrating captive bolt stunning followed by electrical induction of cardiac arrest in veal calves.
    Bartz B; Collins M; Stoddard G; Appleton A; Livingood R; Sobcynski H; Vogel KD
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Sep; 93(9):4557-63. PubMed ID: 26440354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.