BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22571589)

  • 1. On mean-sigma estimators and bias.
    Baldwin P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 22571589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
    Levy R; Svetina D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
    Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
    Magis D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 24016181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting subscores for institutions.
    Haberman S; Sinharay S; Puhan G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):79-95. PubMed ID: 17937841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
    Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using logistic regression to detect item-level non-response bias in surveys.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):234-48. PubMed ID: 12904674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An improved Hochberg procedure for multiple tests of significance.
    Rom DM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 23330866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating population or group sensitivity and its precision from a set of individual d'.
    Bi J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15969839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length.
    Feldt LS; Charter RA
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12741676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
    McGrath RE; Mitchell M; Kim BH; Hough L
    Psychol Bull; 2010 May; 136(3):450-70. PubMed ID: 20438146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying the Rasch sampler to identify aberrant responding through person fit statistics under fixed nominal α-level.
    Spoden C; Fleischer J; Leutner D
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 24992251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.