These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22571589)

  • 41. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Distributions of the Kullback-Leibler divergence with applications.
    Belov DI; Armstrong RD
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):291-309. PubMed ID: 21492134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Controlling decremental and inflationary effects in reliability estimation resulting from violations of assumptions.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):403-24. PubMed ID: 11783569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of statistical selection strategies for univariate and bivariate log-linear models.
    Moses T; Holland PW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):557-74. PubMed ID: 20030964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. On the far reaching effects of using biased estimates of score reliability: an examination of the problem in 20 data analyses.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 11783552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):147-74. PubMed ID: 17535585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.
    Kuijpers RE; van der Ark LA; Croon MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 23663052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparability of item quality indices from sparse data matrices with random and non-random missing data patterns.
    Wolfe EW; McGill MT
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 22357157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Computerized adaptive testing: the capitalization on chance problem.
    Olea J; Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V; Cuevas L
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Mar; 15(1):424-41. PubMed ID: 22379731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparing score tests and other local dependence diagnostics for the graded response model.
    Liu Y; Thissen D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):496-513. PubMed ID: 25286229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Abad FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 11(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 18988447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).
    Risk N
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 26784378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
    Padilla M; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of assay measurement error on parameter estimation in concentration-QTc interval modeling.
    Bonate PL
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 23606626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.
    Thomas ML
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 20644081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance.
    Lubke GH; Dolan CV; Kelderman H; Mellenbergh GJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):231-48. PubMed ID: 14633334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.