159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22571929)
1. A technique for visualization and mapping of local cartilage thickness changes in MR images of osteoarthritic knee.
Ge Q; Cheng Y; Bi K; Guo C; Bai J; Tamura S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3404-11. PubMed ID: 22571929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomically corresponded regional analysis of cartilage in asymptomatic and osteoarthritic knees by statistical shape modelling of the bone.
Williams TG; Holmes AP; Waterton JC; Maciewicz RA; Hutchinson CE; Moots RJ; Nash AF; Taylor CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1541-59. PubMed ID: 20378463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated techniques for visualization and mapping of articular cartilage in MR images of the osteoarthritic knee: a base technique for the assessment of microdamage and submicro damage.
Cashman PM; Kitney RI; Gariba MA; Carter ME
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2002 Mar; 1(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 16689221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model.
Kauffmann C; Gravel P; Godbout B; Gravel A; Beaudoin G; Raynauld JP; Martel-Pelletier J; Pelletier JP; de Guise JA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Aug; 50(8):978-88. PubMed ID: 12892325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3D magnetic resonance images.
Dodin P; Pelletier JP; Martel-Pelletier J; Abram F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 20639173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach.
Folkesson J; Dam EB; Olsen OF; Pettersen PC; Christiansen C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jan; 26(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 17243589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface extraction and thickness measurement of the articular cartilage from MR images using directional gradient vector flow snakes.
Tang J; Millington S; Acton ST; Crandall J; Hurwitz S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):896-907. PubMed ID: 16686412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness.
Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Stahl R; Lee KY; Krause S; Link TM; Majumdar S
Med Image Anal; 2008 Apr; 12(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 17923429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of 3D-MR image registration to monitor diseases around the knee joint.
Takao M; Sugano N; Nishii T; Miki H; Koyama T; Masumoto J; Sato Y; Tamura S; Yoshikawa H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 22(5):656-60. PubMed ID: 16215970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic segmentation of articular cartilage in magnetic resonance images of the knee.
Fripp J; Crozier S; Warfield SK; Ourselin S
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):186-94. PubMed ID: 18044568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of 3T MRI and an unspoiled 3D fast gradient echo sequence for porcine knee cartilage volumetry: preliminary findings.
Cromer MS; Foster SL; Bourne RM; Fransen M; Fulton R; Wang SC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jul; 38(1):245-50. PubMed ID: 23124834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.
Wirth W; Eckstein F
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 18541481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo 3T spiral imaging based multi-slice T(1rho) mapping of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis.
Li X; Han ET; Ma CB; Link TM; Newitt DC; Majumdar S
Magn Reson Med; 2005 Oct; 54(4):929-36. PubMed ID: 16155867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An efficient subset of morphological measures for articular cartilage in the healthy and diseased human knee.
Buck RJ; Wyman BT; Le Graverand MP; Wirth W; Eckstein F;
Magn Reson Med; 2010 Mar; 63(3):680-90. PubMed ID: 20187178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided diagnosis of early knee osteoarthritis based on MRI T2 mapping.
Wu Y; Yang R; Jia S; Li Z; Zhou Z; Lou T
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3379-88. PubMed ID: 25227048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic segmentation of the articular cartilage in knee MRI using a hierarchical multi-class classification scheme.
Folkesson J; Dam E; Olsen OF; Pettersen P; Christiansen C
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):327-34. PubMed ID: 16685862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unsupervised segmentation and quantification of anatomical knee features: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
Tamez-Peña JG; Farber J; González PC; Schreyer E; Schneider E; Totterman S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1177-86. PubMed ID: 22318477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
