BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22572212)

  • 1. Impact of the number of control points has on isodose distributions in a dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery.
    Goraj A; de Boer SF
    Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 22572212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
    Jones S; Williams M
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
    Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
    Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
    Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths: a comparison of achievable dose distributions.
    Nill S; Tücking T; Münter MW; Oelfke U
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Apr; 75(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 15878108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
    Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
    Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of dynamic and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning and delivery.
    Alaei P; Higgins PD; Weaver R; Nguyen N
    Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15023386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric comparison of split field and fixed jaw techniques for large IMRT target volumes in the head and neck.
    Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19944592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
    Mu G; Xia P
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An interlaced IMRT technique for elongated tumor volumes.
    Meyer J; Richter A; Pfreundner L; Guckenberger M; Krieger T; Schwab F; Flentje M
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 19410147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved stratification algorithms for step-and-shoot MLC delivery in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Süss P; Küfer KH; Thieke C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):6039-51. PubMed ID: 17881818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
    Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
    Vivekanandan N; Sriram P; Kumar SA; Bhuvaneswari N; Saranya K
    Med Dosim; 2012; 37(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 21940159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
    Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose sparing of brainstem and spinal cord for re-irradiating recurrent head and neck cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Chen CC; Lee CC; Mah D; Sharma R; Landau E; Garg M; Wu A
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 20202815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
    George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.