These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22572539)

  • 1. Setting characteristics of vinyl-polysiloxane interocclusal recording materials.
    Hatzi P; Tzakis M; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):783-91. PubMed ID: 22572539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials.
    Chun JH; Pae A; Kim SH
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 18614226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coating of silicone-based impression materials in a glow-discharge system by acrylic acid plasma.
    Ozden N; Ayhan H; Erkut S; Can G; Pişkin E
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 9758971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of preference of mixing techniques and duration of mixing and tray loading for two viscosities of vinyl polysiloxane material.
    Nam J; Raigrodski AJ; Townsend J; Lepe X; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17280886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 1494111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials.
    Chai J; Tan E; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):538-42. PubMed ID: 7748448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of five brands of latex gloves on the setting time of polyvinyl siloxane putty impression materials.
    Ravikumar CM; Sangur R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 22945711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
    Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
    Balkenhol M; Haunschild S; Erbe C; Wöstmann B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 20416412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of different fillers on the properties of an experimental vinyl polysiloxane.
    Meincke DK; Ogliari Ade O; Ogliari FA
    Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 27050939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Hardness of Novel Experimental Vinyl Poly Siloxane (VPS) Impression Materials with Commercially Available Ones.
    Ud Din S; Chaudhary FA; Ahmed B; Alam MK; Parker S; Patel M; Javed MQ
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1703869. PubMed ID: 35187157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Pant R; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 18433976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a shear load on the viscosities of 10 vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Pang IC; Chai J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 7932265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.