These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22572539)

  • 21. Evaluation of the elastic recovery of polyether impression materials.
    Endo T; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 16433407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Kess RS; Combe EC; Sparks BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10898846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An investigation of the rheological properties of 10 vinyl-polysiloxane impression materials.
    Chai J; Pang IC; Leong D; Kim JE; Torres P
    J Prosthodont; 1993 Sep; 2(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 8298720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials.
    Chai J; Leong DK; Pang IC
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 3(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 7874254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Working times of elastomeric impression materials determined by dimensional accuracy.
    Tan E; Chai J; Wozniak WT
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 8639243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chew CL; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 8148022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 15610544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Setting characteristics and cavity adaptation of low-shrinking resin composites.
    Papadogiannis D; Kakaboura A; Palaghias G; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1509-16. PubMed ID: 19698981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of cross-linking agent and surfactant on the tear strength of novel vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Patel M
    Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e334-e343. PubMed ID: 30318115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vertical dimensional stability and rigidity of occlusal registration materials.
    Walker MP; Wu E; Heckman ME; Alderman N
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 19903644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Sadan A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):310. PubMed ID: 16121746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tensile elastic recovery of elastomeric impression materials.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18589071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.