307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22572637)
1. Convergent development of anodic bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells.
Yates MD; Kiely PD; Call DF; Rismani-Yazdi H; Bibby K; Peccia J; Regan JM; Logan BE
ISME J; 2012 Nov; 6(11):2002-13. PubMed ID: 22572637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Community analysis of biofilms on flame-oxidized stainless steel anodes in microbial fuel cells fed with different substrates.
Eyiuche NJ; Asakawa S; Yamashita T; Ikeguchi A; Kitamura Y; Yokoyama H
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):145. PubMed ID: 28662640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors.
Jung S; Regan JM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 77(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 17786426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbial communities and electrochemical performance of titanium-based anodic electrodes in a microbial fuel cell.
Michaelidou U; ter Heijne A; Euverink GJ; Hamelers HV; Stams AJ; Geelhoed JS
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 77(3):1069-75. PubMed ID: 21131513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enrichment of anodic biofilm inoculated with anaerobic or aerobic sludge in single chambered air-cathode microbial fuel cells.
Gao C; Wang A; Wu WM; Yin Y; Zhao YG
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Sep; 167():124-32. PubMed ID: 24973773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does pre-enrichment of anodes with acetate to select for
Christgen B; Spurr M; Milner EM; Izadi P; McCann C; Yu E; Curtis T; Scott K; Head IM
Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1199286. PubMed ID: 38075904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic changes in the microbial community composition in microbial fuel cells fed with sucrose.
Beecroft NJ; Zhao F; Varcoe JR; Slade RC; Thumser AE; Avignone-Rossa C
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Jan; 93(1):423-37. PubMed ID: 21984392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Change in microbial communities in acetate- and glucose-fed microbial fuel cells in the presence of light.
Xing D; Cheng S; Regan JM; Logan BE
Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Sep; 25(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 19574034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of hydraulic pressure on the performance of single chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells.
Cheng S; Liu W; Guo J; Sun D; Pan B; Ye Y; Ding W; Huang H; Li F
Biosens Bioelectron; 2014 Jun; 56():264-70. PubMed ID: 24514078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anode microbial communities produced by changing from microbial fuel cell to microbial electrolysis cell operation using two different wastewaters.
Kiely PD; Cusick R; Call DF; Selembo PA; Regan JM; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):388-94. PubMed ID: 20554197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamics of different bacterial communities are capable of generating sustainable electricity from microbial fuel cells with organic waste.
Yamamoto S; Suzuki K; Araki Y; Mochihara H; Hosokawa T; Kubota H; Chiba Y; Rubaba O; Tashiro Y; Futamata H
Microbes Environ; 2014; 29(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 24789988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial communities adapted to higher external resistance can reduce the onset potential of anode in microbial fuel cells.
Suzuki K; Kato Y; Yui A; Yamamoto S; Ando S; Rubaba O; Tashiro Y; Futamata H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2018 May; 125(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 29373307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Anodic Community in Microbial Fuel Cells with Iron Oxide-Reducing Community.
Yokoyama H; Ishida M; Yamashita T
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):757-62. PubMed ID: 26767577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbial fuel cell anodic microbial population dynamics during MFC start-up.
Paitier A; Godain A; Lyon D; Haddour N; Vogel TM; Monier JM
Biosens Bioelectron; 2017 Jun; 92():357-363. PubMed ID: 27836597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrochemical performance and microbial community profiles in microbial fuel cells in relation to electron transfer mechanisms.
Uria N; Ferrera I; Mas J
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):208. PubMed ID: 29047333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells.
Commault AS; Lear G; Packer MA; Weld RJ
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 139():226-34. PubMed ID: 23665518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population dynamics of electrogenic microbial communities in microbial fuel cells started with three different inoculum sources.
Ishii S; Suzuki S; Yamanaka Y; Wu A; Nealson KH; Bretschger O
Bioelectrochemistry; 2017 Oct; 117():74-82. PubMed ID: 28641173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced electricity production by use of reconstituted artificial consortia of estuarine bacteria grown as biofilms.
Zhang J; Zhang E; Scott K; Burgess JG
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2984-92. PubMed ID: 22352455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anodic biofilms in microbial fuel cells harbor low numbers of higher-power-producing bacteria than abundant genera.
Kiely PD; Call DF; Yates MD; Regan JM; Logan BE
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Sep; 88(1):371-80. PubMed ID: 20632002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbial community composition and electricity generation in cattle manure slurry treatment using microbial fuel cells: effects of inoculum addition.
Xie B; Gong W; Ding A; Yu H; Qu F; Tang X; Yan Z; Li G; Liang H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Oct; 24(29):23226-23235. PubMed ID: 28831702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
