These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22573881)

  • 1. Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records.
    Spriggs M; Arnold MV; Pearce CM; Fry C
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):535-9. PubMed ID: 22573881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
    Andrews L; Gajanayake R; Sahama T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Dec; 83(12):889-900. PubMed ID: 25200198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Australia's personally controlled electronic health record and primary healthcare: generating a framework for implementation and evaluation.
    Almond H; Cummings E; Turner P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 188():1-6. PubMed ID: 23823280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes of pregnant women towards personally controlled electronic, hospital-held, and patient-held medical record systems: a survey study.
    Quinlivan JA; Lyons S; Petersen RW
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Sep; 20(9):810-5. PubMed ID: 25046543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records.
    Kerai P; Wood P; Martin M
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 24382474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowledge and attitudes regarding the personally controlled electronic health record: an Australian national survey.
    Lehnbom EC; Brien JE; McLachlan AJ
    Intern Med J; 2014 Apr; 44(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 24754689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A qualitative study of Australians' opinions about personally controlled electronic health records.
    Lehnbom EC; McLachlan A; Brien JA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():105-10. PubMed ID: 22797027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient perspectives on a personally controlled electronic health record used in regional Australia.
    Hanna L; Gill SD; Newstead L; Hawkins M; Osborne RH
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Jan; 46(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 27486184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic health records: privacy, confidentiality, and security.
    Harman LB; Flite CA; Bond K
    Virtual Mentor; 2012 Sep; 14(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 23351350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical issues in HealthConnect's shared electronic health record system.
    McSherry B
    J Law Med; 2004 Aug; 12(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 15359550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics and subsequent use of electronic health record data.
    Lee LM
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Jul; 71():143-146. PubMed ID: 28578074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive beliefs and privacy concerns shape the future for the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record.
    Lehnbom EC; Douglas HE; Makeham MA
    Intern Med J; 2016 Jan; 46(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 26813902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A software platform to analyse the ethical issues of electronic patient privacy policy: the S3P example.
    Mizani MA; Baykal N
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Dec; 33(12):695-8. PubMed ID: 18055898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working towards a national health information system in Australia.
    Bomba B; Cooper J; Miller M
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1633. PubMed ID: 8591519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is patient confidentiality compromised with the electronic health record?: a position paper.
    Wallace IM
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2015 Feb; 33(2):58-62; quiz E1. PubMed ID: 25532832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Giving patients granular control of personal health information: using an ethics 'Points to Consider' to inform informatics system designers.
    Meslin EM; Alpert SA; Carroll AE; Odell JD; Tierney WM; Schwartz PH
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Dec; 82(12):1136-43. PubMed ID: 24139626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The My Health Record debate: ethical and cultural issues.
    Komesaroff PA; Kerridge I
    Intern Med J; 2018 Nov; 48(11):1291-1293. PubMed ID: 30387316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breaches of health information: are electronic records different from paper records?
    Sade RM
    J Clin Ethics; 2010; 21(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 20465074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical, legal, and social implications of incorporating genomic information into electronic health records.
    Hazin R; Brothers KB; Malin BA; Koenig BA; Sanderson SC; Rothstein MA; Williams MS; Clayton EW; Kullo IJ
    Genet Med; 2013 Oct; 15(10):810-6. PubMed ID: 24030434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic care plans and medicolegal liability.
    Paterson M; Jones K; Schattner P; Adaji A; Piterman L
    Aust Fam Physician; 2011 Jun; 40(6):432-4. PubMed ID: 21655494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.