These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22573909)

  • 1. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 22573909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative assessment of forces and moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Katsaros C; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 21464153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Torque expression of 0.018 and 0.022 inch conventional brackets.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 35(5):610-4. PubMed ID: 22828075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro biomechanical analysis of torque capabilities of various 0.018″ lingual bracket-wire systems: total torque play and slot size.
    Daratsianos N; Bourauel C; Fimmers R; Jäger A; Schwestka-Polly R
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 26518759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moments generated during simulated rotational correction with self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Eliades T; Partowi S; Bourauel C
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1030-4. PubMed ID: 18947286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets.
    Papageorgiou SN; Sifakakis I; Doulis I; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():5. PubMed ID: 26780465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
    Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth.
    Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Khawatmi S; Dirk C; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):419-425. PubMed ID: 28339591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets.
    Morina E; Eliades T; Pandis N; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 18540011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 23678999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical analysis of the improved superelastic Ni-Ti alloy wire using the orthodontic simulator with high-precision sensors.
    Mikami N; Yonemitsu I; Takemura H; Kondou M; Soga K; Suga K; Kanno Z; Lai W; Uo M; Ono T
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105861. PubMed ID: 37146519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical effects of third-order movement in self-ligated brackets by the measurement of torque expression.
    Major TW; Carey JP; Nobes DS; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e31-44. PubMed ID: 21195255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative assessment of forces generated during simulated alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 19349418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of passive play and torque expression in self-ligating and traditional lingual brackets.
    Albertini P; Mazzanti V; Mollica F; Lombardo L; Siciliani G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Jan; 83(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34185103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Biomechanical analysis of orthodontic brackets with different closing mechanisms].
    Morina E; Keilig L; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Apr; 54(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 19335123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of contemporary lingual orthodontic brackets.
    Zinelis S; Sifakakis I; Katsaros C; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 24232131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections.
    Pandis N; Eliades T; Partowi S; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):738-42. PubMed ID: 18456148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets.
    Badawi HM; Toogood RW; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):721-8. PubMed ID: 18456146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of buccal-lingual slot dimension size on third-order torque response.
    Romanyk DL; Au K; Isfeld D; Heo G; Major MP; Major PW
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 27259532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.