110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22574654)
1. The evaluation of statistical methods for estimating the lower limit of detection.
Huang S; Wang T; Yang M
Assay Drug Dev Technol; 2013 Feb; 11(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 22574654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
Springate SD
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating population distributions when some data are below a limit of detection by using a reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator.
Gillespie BW; Chen Q; Reichert H; Franzblau A; Hedgeman E; Lepkowski J; Adriaens P; Demond A; Luksemburg W; Garabrant DH
Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21 Suppl 4():S64-70. PubMed ID: 20386104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An iterative method for improved estimation of the mean of peer-group distributions in proficiency testing.
Ichihara K; Kawai T
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(4):412-21. PubMed ID: 15899658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
Waksman JA
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robust process capability indices C
Kashif M; Ullah S; Aslam M; Iqbal MZ
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16977. PubMed ID: 37813919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of maximum likelihood procedures to estimate left censored observations.
Jain RB; Caudill SP; Wang RY; Monsell E
Anal Chem; 2008 Feb; 80(4):1124-32. PubMed ID: 18197633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.
Wan X; Wang W; Liu J; Tong T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():135. PubMed ID: 25524443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating Left-Censored Data Through Substitution, Parametric, Semi-parametric, and Nonparametric Methods: A Simulation Study.
Tekindal MA; Erdoğan BD; Yavuz Y
Interdiscip Sci; 2017 Jun; 9(2):153-172. PubMed ID: 26590921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical evaluation of several methods for cut-point determination of immunogenicity screening assay.
Shen M; Dong X; Tsong Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 25356783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
Padilla M; Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing four methods to estimate usual intake distributions.
Souverein OW; Dekkers AL; Geelen A; Haubrock J; de Vries JH; Ocké MC; Harttig U; Boeing H; van 't Veer P;
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S92-101. PubMed ID: 21731012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of the limit of detection with a bootstrap-derived standard error by a partly non-parametric approach. Application to HPLC drug assays.
Linnet K
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 15899655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating mean exposures from censored data: exposure to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry.
Glass DC; Gray CN
Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jun; 45(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 11378148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of lognormally distributed exposure data with repeated measures and values below the limit of detection using SAS.
Jin Y; Hein MJ; Deddens JA; Hines CJ
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jan; 55(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 21177260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference interval estimation: Methodological comparison using extensive simulations and empirical data.
Daly CH; Higgins V; Adeli K; Grey VL; Hamid JS
Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1145-1158. PubMed ID: 28733190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
Cole SR; Chu H; Nie L; Schisterman EF
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 38(6):1674-80. PubMed ID: 19667054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
