These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22576479)

  • 21. Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity.
    Hayashi M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 14653280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 20 years: Part IV. The effects of combinations of variables.
    Malament KA; Socransky SS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 20305851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Longevity of direct restorations in Dutch dental practices. Descriptive study out of a practice based research network.
    Laske M; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Braspenning JC; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2016 Mar; 46():12-7. PubMed ID: 26790901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
    Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children.
    Lo EC; Holmgren CJ; Hu D; van Palenstein Helderman W
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 35(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17822487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
    Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-year evaluation of the ART approach in Class III and V restorations in permanent anterior teeth.
    Cefaly DF; Tapety CM; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Phantumvanit P; Navarro MF
    Caries Res; 2006; 40(5):389-92. PubMed ID: 16946606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
    Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition.
    Manhart J; Chen H; Hamm G; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):481-508. PubMed ID: 15470871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of Solitaire-2 restorations placed in United Kingdom general dental practices: 1-year report.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; McDermott K; Lamb JJ; Siddons C; Weller B; Balkenhol M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Sep; 34(8):594-9. PubMed ID: 14620210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.