These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22576974)

  • 1. The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.
    Sheridan H; Reingold EM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1122-31. PubMed ID: 22576974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting effects of contextual strength on the subordinate bias effect: evidence from eye movements.
    Colbert-Getz J; Cook AE
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1172-84. PubMed ID: 23702917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using puns to study contextual influences on lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from eye movements.
    Sheridan H; Reingold EM; Daneman M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):875-81. PubMed ID: 19815792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye Movements while Reading Biased Homographs: Effects of Prior Encounter and Biasing Context on Reducing the Subordinate Bias Effect.
    Leinenger M; Rayner K
    J Cogn Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jan; 25(6):665-681. PubMed ID: 24073328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-age comparisons reveal multiple strategies for lexical ambiguity resolution during natural reading.
    Stites MC; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1823-41. PubMed ID: 23687920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: evidence from eye movement studies.
    Pacht JM; Rayner K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1993 Mar; 22(2):251-71. PubMed ID: 8366477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations.
    Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Apr; 18(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 21327339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.
    Staub A; White SJ; Drieghe D; Hollway EC; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1280-93. PubMed ID: 20873939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.
    Juhasz BJ; Sheridan H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 31278632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resolution of lexical ambiguity: evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm.
    Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 May; 21(3):582-95. PubMed ID: 7602263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.
    Kambe G; Rayner K; Duffy SA
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 11352220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual information: evidence from lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Peleg O; Eviatar Z
    Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 17976714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant-biased context.
    Tsang YK; Chen HC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):875-81. PubMed ID: 21169583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.
    Staub A; Benatar A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1304-11. PubMed ID: 23637011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.
    Folk JR; Morris RK
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 12699146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect.
    Martin C; Vu H; Kellas G; Metcalf K
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):813-39. PubMed ID: 10660407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contextual strength and the subordinate bias effect: comment on Martin, Vu, Kellas, and Metcalf.
    Rayner K; Binder KS; Duffy SA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):841-52; discussion 853-5. PubMed ID: 10605394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do resource constraints affect lexical processing? Evidence from eye movements.
    Leinenger M; Myslín M; Rayner K; Levy R
    J Mem Lang; 2017 Apr; 93():82-103. PubMed ID: 28503023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Literacy skill and intra-individual variability in eye-fixation durations during reading: Evidence from a diverse community-based adult sample.
    Payne BR; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):1841-1861. PubMed ID: 32484390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.