These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22577288)

  • 1. Unsupervised two-way clustering of metagenomic sequences.
    Prabhakara S; Acharya R
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2012; 2012():153647. PubMed ID: 22577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
    Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
    Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel abundance-based algorithm for binning metagenomic sequences using l-tuples.
    Wu YW; Ye Y
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):523-34. PubMed ID: 21385052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating DNA coverage and abundance in metagenomes using a gamma approximation.
    Hooper SD; Dalevi D; Pati A; Mavromatis K; Ivanova NN; Kyrpides NC
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 26(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 20008478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MTR: taxonomic annotation of short metagenomic reads using clustering at multiple taxonomic ranks.
    Gori F; Folino G; Jetten MS; Marchiori E
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 27(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 21127032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploiting topic modeling to boost metagenomic reads binning.
    Zhang R; Cheng Z; Guan J; Zhou S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 25859745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
    Dubinkina VB; Ischenko DS; Ulyantsev VI; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():38. PubMed ID: 26774270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infer Metagenomic Abundance and Reveal Homologous Genomes Based on the Structure of Taxonomy Tree.
    Qiu YQ; Tian X; Zhang S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(5):1112-22. PubMed ID: 26451823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binning Metagenomic Contigs Using Unsupervised Clustering and Reference Databases.
    Jiang Z; Li X; Guo L
    Interdiscip Sci; 2022 Dec; 14(4):795-803. PubMed ID: 35639335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A New Unsupervised Binning Approach for Metagenomic Sequences Based on N-grams and Automatic Feature Weighting.
    Liao R; Zhang R; Guan J; Zhou S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 26355506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep learning models for bacteria taxonomic classification of metagenomic data.
    Fiannaca A; La Paglia L; La Rosa M; Lo Bosco G; Renda G; Rizzo R; Gaglio S; Urso A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(Suppl 7):198. PubMed ID: 30066629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mora: abundance aware metagenomic read re-assignment for disentangling similar strains.
    Zheng A; Shaw J; Yu YW
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Apr; 25(1):161. PubMed ID: 38649836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Large-scale metagenomic sequence clustering on map-reduce clusters.
    Yang X; Zola J; Aluru S
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Feb; 11(1):1340001. PubMed ID: 23427983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the composition of species in metagenomes by clustering of next-generation read sequences.
    Seok HS; Hong W; Kim J
    Methods; 2014 Oct; 69(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 25072168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unsupervised binning of environmental genomic fragments based on an error robust selection of l-mers.
    Yang B; Peng Y; Leung HC; Yiu SM; Chen JC; Chin FY
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S5. PubMed ID: 20406503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.
    Herath D; Tang SL; Tandon K; Ackland D; Halgamuge SK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):571. PubMed ID: 29297295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MetaID: a novel method for identification and quantification of metagenomic samples.
    Srinivasan SM; Guda C
    BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):S4. PubMed ID: 24564518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of metagenomic assembly using simulated next generation sequencing data.
    Mende DR; Waller AS; Sunagawa S; Järvelin AI; Chan MM; Arumugam M; Raes J; Bork P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31386. PubMed ID: 22384016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of metagenomic assemblers based on hybrid reads of real and simulated metagenomic sequences.
    Wang Z; Wang Y; Fuhrman JA; Sun F; Zhu S
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 May; 21(3):777-790. PubMed ID: 30860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RAIphy: phylogenetic classification of metagenomics samples using iterative refinement of relative abundance index profiles.
    Nalbantoglu OU; Way SF; Hinrichs SH; Sayood K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():41. PubMed ID: 21281493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.