These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22577288)

  • 61. Accurate and fast estimation of taxonomic profiles from metagenomic shotgun sequences.
    Liu B; Gibbons T; Ghodsi M; Treangen T; Pop M
    BMC Genomics; 2011; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S4. PubMed ID: 21989143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Metagenomic taxonomic classification using extreme learning machines.
    Rasheed Z; Rangwala H
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2012 Oct; 10(5):1250015. PubMed ID: 22849369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Metagenome sequence clustering with hash-based canopies.
    Rahman MA; LaPierre N; Rangwala H; Barbara D
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(6):1740006. PubMed ID: 29113561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Libra: scalable k-mer-based tool for massive all-vs-all metagenome comparisons.
    Choi I; Ponsero AJ; Bomhoff M; Youens-Clark K; Hartman JH; Hurwitz BL
    Gigascience; 2019 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 30597002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A better sequence-read simulator program for metagenomics.
    Johnson S; Trost B; Long JR; Pittet V; Kusalik A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S14. PubMed ID: 25253095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Gene prediction with Glimmer for metagenomic sequences augmented by classification and clustering.
    Kelley DR; Liu B; Delcher AL; Pop M; Salzberg SL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jan; 40(1):e9. PubMed ID: 22102569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A de Bruijn graph approach to the quantification of closely-related genomes in a microbial community.
    Wang M; Ye Y; Tang H
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):814-25. PubMed ID: 22697249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Metagenomic Assembly: Reconstructing Genomes from Metagenomes.
    Wang Z; Liang JL; Huang LN; Mengoni A; Shu WS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2242():139-152. PubMed ID: 33961222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. WebCARMA: a web application for the functional and taxonomic classification of unassembled metagenomic reads.
    Gerlach W; Jünemann S; Tille F; Goesmann A; Stoye J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 10():430. PubMed ID: 20021646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. MBBC: an efficient approach for metagenomic binning based on clustering.
    Wang Y; Hu H; Li X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():36. PubMed ID: 25652152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Quality control of microbiota metagenomics by k-mer analysis.
    Plaza Onate F; Batto JM; Juste C; Fadlallah J; Fougeroux C; Gouas D; Pons N; Kennedy S; Levenez F; Dore J; Ehrlich SD; Gorochov G; Larsen M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):183. PubMed ID: 25887914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. MetaConClust - Unsupervised Binning of Metagenomics Data using Consensus Clustering.
    Sinha D; Sharma A; Mishra DC; Rai A; Lal SB; Kumar S; Farooqi MS; Chaturvedi KK
    Curr Genomics; 2022 Jun; 23(2):137-146. PubMed ID: 36778980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Use of simulated data sets to evaluate the fidelity of metagenomic processing methods.
    Mavromatis K; Ivanova N; Barry K; Shapiro H; Goltsman E; McHardy AC; Rigoutsos I; Salamov A; Korzeniewski F; Land M; Lapidus A; Grigoriev I; Richardson P; Hugenholtz P; Kyrpides NC
    Nat Methods; 2007 Jun; 4(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 17468765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. FragGeneScan: predicting genes in short and error-prone reads.
    Rho M; Tang H; Ye Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Nov; 38(20):e191. PubMed ID: 20805240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Peptide markers of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases facilitate taxa counting in metagenomic data.
    Persi E; Weingart U; Freilich S; Horn D
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Feb; 13():65. PubMed ID: 22325056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. TWARIT: an extremely rapid and efficient approach for phylogenetic classification of metagenomic sequences.
    Reddy RM; Mohammed MH; Mande SS
    Gene; 2012 Sep; 505(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 22710135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Pseudoalignment for metagenomic read assignment.
    Schaeffer L; Pimentel H; Bray N; Melsted P; Pachter L
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(14):2082-2088. PubMed ID: 28334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Re-purposing software for functional characterization of the microbiome.
    Gardiner LJ; Haiminen N; Utro F; Parida L; Seabolt E; Krishna R; Kaufman JH
    Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 33422152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. COCACOLA: binning metagenomic contigs using sequence COmposition, read CoverAge, CO-alignment and paired-end read LinkAge.
    Lu YY; Chen T; Fuhrman JA; Sun F
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 33(6):791-798. PubMed ID: 27256312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Accurate genome relative abundance estimation based on shotgun metagenomic reads.
    Xia LC; Cram JA; Chen T; Fuhrman JA; Sun F
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e27992. PubMed ID: 22162995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.