These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2257733)

  • 41. Reference intervals: an update.
    Horn PS; Pesce AJ
    Clin Chim Acta; 2003 Aug; 334(1-2):5-23. PubMed ID: 12867273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A computer program for estimation of reference percentile values in laboratory data.
    Rossing RG; Hatcher WE
    Comput Programs Biomed; 1979 Jan; 9(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 365438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. External Quality Assessment: an effective tool for Clinical Governance in laboratory medicine.
    Sciacovelli L; Secchiero S; Zardo L; Zaninotto M; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(6):740-9. PubMed ID: 16729863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Immigrant health: laboratory reference ranges may differ from indigenous population's with potential for misinterpretation.
    Masukume G
    Ir Med J; 2017 May; 110(5):573. PubMed ID: 28737314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Significance of reference value and cut-off value in clinical laboratory tests].
    Miyake K
    Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 94(12):2467-72. PubMed ID: 16419585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Nationwide multicenter study aimed at the establishment of common reference intervals for standardized clinical laboratory tests in Japan.
    Yamamoto Y; Hosogaya S; Osawa S; Ichihara K; Onuma T; Saito A; Banba K; Araki H; Nagamine Y; Shinohara K; Okada G; Matsumoto H; Oguri T; Gonaikawa S; Iwagami M;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 51(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 23612542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The NEXUS vision: an alternative to the reference value concept.
    Goldschmidt HM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):868-73. PubMed ID: 15327025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A plea for intra-laboratory reference limits. Part 1. General considerations and concepts for determination.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Arzideh F
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(8):1033-42. PubMed ID: 17867993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Biological variations as objective measures of analytical precision and clinic informativity in laboratory tests (lecture)].
    Men'shikov VV; Lukichev TI; Pimenova LM
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2004 May; (5):21-32. PubMed ID: 15230113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
    Cai T
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Quantitative evaluation of reproducibility of clinical laboratory data day by day].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2003 Mar; (3):50-4. PubMed ID: 12715399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Higher order inference for the consensus mean in inter-laboratory studies.
    Sharma G; Mathew T
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 21259313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Comparative analyses of reference values used in Polish medical diagnostic laboratories for selected biochemical investigations].
    Przybył-Hac B; Brzeziński AM; Paradowski M
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2013 Jul; 35(205):28-36. PubMed ID: 23984602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Optimization of results of laboratory measurements in patient biological specimens].
    Kallner A; Khorovskaia LA; Emanuél' VL; Miagkova LM; Bondarenko IB
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2002 Jul; (7):39-42. PubMed ID: 12187590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quality control of laboratory results in real time.
    Picco W; Pinna Pintor L; Baruzzo G; Pistono O; Triumbari F; Pinna Pintor P
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1992 Mar; 4(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1576336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [New era of laboratory testing. Topics: I. Generals; 2. Setup of common reference intervals].
    Kang D
    Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 102(12):3088-95. PubMed ID: 24605555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Validation of an enzyme calibrator--an IFCC guideline. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry.
    Férard G; Edwards J; Kanno T; Lessinger JM; Moss DW; Schiele F; Tietz NW; Vassault A
    Clin Biochem; 1998 Aug; 31(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 9740972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An algorithm for the selection of proper group intervals for histograms representing clinical laboratory data.
    Martin HF; Gudzinowicz BJ; Driscoll JL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1975 Sep; 64(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 1163484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of blood lead proficiency testing: comparison of open and blind paradigms.
    Parsons PJ; Reilly AA; Esernio-Jenssen D; Werk LN; Mofenson HC; Stanton NV; Matte TD
    Clin Chem; 2001 Feb; 47(2):322-30. PubMed ID: 11159782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Construction of age-related reference centiles using absolute residuals.
    Altman DG
    Stat Med; 1993 May; 12(10):917-24. PubMed ID: 8337548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.