These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22577834)

  • 1. Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making.
    Toma C; Vasiljevic D; Oberlé D; Butera F
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 52(1):161-72. PubMed ID: 22577834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hidden profiles and concealed information: strategic information sharing and use in group decision making.
    Toma C; Butera F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):793-806. PubMed ID: 19332434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making.
    Stewart DD; Stasser G
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1995 Oct; 69(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 7473023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions.
    Maciejovsky B; Budescu DV
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 May; 92(5):854-70. PubMed ID: 17484609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategic use of preference confirmation in group decision making: the role of competition and dissent.
    Toma C; Gilles I; Butera F
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 52(1):44-63. PubMed ID: 21671949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and perceived expert status in group decisions: when minority members make majority members more accurate privately.
    Sinaceur M; Thomas-Hunt MC; Neale MA; O'Neill OA; Haag C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Mar; 36(3):423-37. PubMed ID: 20179318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies.
    Rico R; Sánchez-Manzanares M; Antino M; Lau D
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 21875173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When those who know do share: Group goals facilitate information sharing, but social power does not undermine it.
    Scholl A; Landkammer F; Sassenberg K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213795. PubMed ID: 30856234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality.
    Schulz-Hardt S; Brodbeck FC; Mojzisch A; Kerschreiter R; Frey D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1080-93. PubMed ID: 17144766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do children share information in groups?
    Gummerum M; Leman PJ; Hollins TS
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Aug; 50(8):2105-14. PubMed ID: 24911565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: a meta-analysis.
    Lu L; Yuan YC; McLeod PL
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2012 Feb; 16(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 21896790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness.
    Park G; Deshon RP
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Sep; 95(5):824-33. PubMed ID: 20718527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information sampling and group decision making: the effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience.
    Greitemeyer T; Schulz-Hardt S; Brodbeck FC; Frey D
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 16536657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Group performance is maximized by hierarchical competence distribution.
    Zafeiris A; Vicsek T
    Nat Commun; 2013; 4():2484. PubMed ID: 24048260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face structure predicts cooperation: men with wider faces are more generous to their in-group when out-group competition is salient.
    Stirrat M; Perrett DI
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jul; 23(7):718-22. PubMed ID: 22623509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques?
    Sueur C; Petit O
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 18281161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reading people's minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making.
    de Melo CM; Carnevale PJ; Read SJ; Gratch J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jan; 106(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 24079297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Knowing others' preferences degrades the quality of group decisions.
    Mojzisch A; Schulz-Hardt S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 May; 98(5):794-808. PubMed ID: 20438225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Socially-shared cognition and consensus in small groups.
    Levine JM
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2018 Oct; 23():52-56. PubMed ID: 29306838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oxytocin differentially modulates compromise and competitive approach but not withdrawal to antagonists from own vs. rivaling other groups.
    Ten Velden FS; Baas M; Shalvi S; Kret ME; De Dreu CK
    Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 1580():172-9. PubMed ID: 24055737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.