These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22578040)

  • 1. What difference reveals about similarity.
    Sagi E; Gentner D; Lovett A
    Cogn Sci; 2012 Aug; 36(6):1019-50. PubMed ID: 22578040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course of similarity effects in visual search.
    Guest D; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1667-88. PubMed ID: 22004196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further analysis of the Crist data on matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Pike R; Jackson K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Sep; 112(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 6225827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task.
    Boot I; Pecher D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):942-54. PubMed ID: 19731189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similarity dependency of the change in ERP component N1 accompanying with the object recognition learning.
    Tokudome W; Wang G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 22115890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transformation and alignment in similarity.
    Hodgetts CJ; Hahn U; Chater N
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):62-79. PubMed ID: 19720370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Registration strategies and similarity measures for three-dimensional ultrasound mosaicing.
    Wachinger C; Wein W; Navab N
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):1404-15. PubMed ID: 18995191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of object similarity in the production and identification of actions associated with objects.
    Desmarais G; Pensa MC; Dixon MJ; Roy EA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Nov; 13(6):1021-34. PubMed ID: 17942020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-dimensional probabilistic images discrimination. I. Simultaneously presented pairs of patterns.
    Bohdanecký Z; Bozkov V; Radil-Weiss T
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1977; 37(5):325-33. PubMed ID: 596256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Entropy and variability discrimination.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):278-93. PubMed ID: 11204103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets.
    Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activation and integration of motor components in a short-term priming paradigm.
    Labeye E; Oker A; Badard G; Versace R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 18573487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A structural account of global and local processing.
    Love BC; Rouder JN; Wisniewski EJ
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Mar; 38(2):291-316. PubMed ID: 10090805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptation to objects in the lateral occipital complex (LOC): shape or semantics?
    Kim JG; Biederman I; Lescroart MD; Hayworth KJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2297-305. PubMed ID: 19577590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acquired prosopagnosia as a face-specific disorder: ruling out the general visual similarity account.
    Busigny T; Graf M; Mayer E; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2051-67. PubMed ID: 20362595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similarity-based asymmetries in perceptual matching.
    Hodgetts CJ; Hahn U
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 22305350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search.
    Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1350-60. PubMed ID: 21491164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural alignment facilitates the noticing of differences.
    Gentner D; Gunn V
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jun; 29(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 11504005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are coarse scales sufficient for fast detection of visual threat?
    Mermillod M; Droit-Volet S; Devaux D; Schaefer A; Vermeulen N
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1429-37. PubMed ID: 20817781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.