These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2257828)

  • 1. [Comparative biological testing of Ketac-Bond glass ionomer cement].
    Beer R; Gängler P; Wutzler P; Krehan F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Apr; 45(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 2257828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities.
    Hosoda H; Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Harnirattisai C; Otsuki M
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(4):122-9. PubMed ID: 1805180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements.
    Michelini FS; Belser UC; Scherrer SS; De Rijk WG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 7575974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of cements and eugenol on properties of a visible light-cured composite.
    Powell TL; Huget EF
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 8327359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiopacity of resin-modified glass ionomer liners and bases.
    Shah PM; Sidhu SK; Chong BS; Ford TR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Mar; 77(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 9069077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulp reactions to light-cured glass ionomer cements.
    Gaintantzopoulou MD; Willis GP; Kafrawy AH
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 9115678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading.
    Wiskott HW; Belser UC; Scherrer SS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 10635194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Pulp toxicity of luting cements].
    Grund P; Raab WH
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Nov; 45(11):736-9. PubMed ID: 2269096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Demineralization resistance and tensile bond strength of four luting agents after acid attack.
    Stannard JG; Sornkul E
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 2640123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials.
    Burgess JO; Barghi N; Chan DC; Hummert T
    Am J Dent; 1993 Jun; 6(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 8240775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histopathological investigation of the effects of various glass-ionomer cements on dental pulp.
    Tarim B; Yücel T; Alatli C; Acar E; Olgaç V
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):429-33. PubMed ID: 9582626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Loher H; Kolbeck C; Trempler C; Stemplinger B; Kopzon V; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 18372038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH; Driscoll CF; Hondrum SO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study.
    Mannocci F; Ferrari M; Watson TF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 11264937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The constitution, physical properties and biocompatibility of modified accelerated cement.
    Camilleri J; Montesin FE; Juszczyk AS; Papaioannou S; Curtis RV; Donald FM; Ford TR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 17659330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.