These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22578282)

  • 1. An in vitro study of factors affecting the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Holm L; Cunningham SJ; Petrie A; Cousley RR
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):1022-8. PubMed ID: 22578282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical stability and clinical applicability assessment of novel orthodontic mini-implant design.
    Song HN; Hong C; Banh R; Ohebsion T; Asatrian G; Leung HY; Wu BM; Moon W
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):832-41. PubMed ID: 23627420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Angled-predrilling depth and mini-implant shape effects on the mechanical properties of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants during the angled insertion procedure.
    Heo YY; Cho KC; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):881-8. PubMed ID: 22390676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cortical thickness on the stability of mini-implants with microthreads.
    Vilani GN; Ruellas AC; Mattos CT; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of vertical placement angle on the insertion torque of mini-implants in human alveolar bone.
    Maya RR; Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Gurgel JA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(5):47-52. PubMed ID: 27901228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of size and insertion angle of orthodontic mini-implants on skeletal anchorage.
    Tatli U; Alraawi M; Toroğlu MS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 31375232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of placement angle, diameter, length and bone density on the pull-out strength of orthodontic mini-implants: An in vitro study.
    Mohan S; Srinivasan D; Arumugam E; Devasahayam D; Kannan R
    J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):143-150. PubMed ID: 34666551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of predrilling depth and implant shape on the mechanical properties of orthodontic mini-implants during the insertion procedure.
    Cho KC; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Jul; 82(4):618-24. PubMed ID: 22050073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peak insertion torque values of five mini-implant systems under different insertion loads.
    Quraishi E; Sherriff M; Bister D
    J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 24521745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of thread depth, taper shape, and taper length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Chang JZ; Chen YJ; Tung YY; Chiang YY; Lai EH; Chen WP; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 22381488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of wobbling angle on the stability measures of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion and removal procedures.
    Cho IS; Baek SH; Kim YH
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):1009-14. PubMed ID: 23663168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of insertion angle and implant thread type on the fracture properties of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion.
    Cho IS; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 23216058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability comparison between commercially available mini-implants and a novel design: part 1.
    Hong C; Lee H; Webster R; Kwak J; Wu BM; Moon W
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):692-9. PubMed ID: 21306226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine-driven versus manual insertion mode: influence on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Novsak D; Trinajstic Zrinski M; Spalj S
    Implant Dent; 2015 Feb; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25379660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of insertion torque and mechanical stability for self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic miniscrews - an in vitro study.
    Tepedino M; Masedu F; Chimenti C
    Head Face Med; 2017 May; 13(1):10. PubMed ID: 28558821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro investigation of peak insertion torque values of six commercially available mini-implants.
    Whang CZ; Bister D; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 21186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distribution and amount of stresses caused by insertion or removal of orthodontic miniscrews into the maxillary bone: A finite element analysis.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Kazemi P; Moradinezhad M; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):758-768. PubMed ID: 31494087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.