These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Robotic endoscopic surgery of the skull base: a novel surgical approach. Hanna EY; Holsinger C; DeMonte F; Kupferman M Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Dec; 133(12):1209-14. PubMed ID: 18086961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Submandibular gland endoscopic resection: a cadaveric study. Guyot L; Duroure F; Richard O; Lebeau J; Passagia JG; Raphael B Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 34(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 16053851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms. Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prospects of robotic thyroidectomy using a gasless, transaxillary approach for the management of thyroid carcinoma. Kang SW; Park JH; Jeong JS; Lee CR; Park S; Lee SH; Jeong JJ; Nam KH; Chung WY; Park CS Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Aug; 21(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 21857469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Utility of the Highly Articulated Flex Robotic System for Head and Neck Procedures: A Cadaveric Study. Newsome H; Mandapathil M; Koh YW; Duvvuri U Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Sep; 125(9):758-63. PubMed ID: 27287677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures. Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The robotic-assisted left lateral hepatic segmentectomy: the next step. Vasile S; Sgarbură O; Tomulescu V; Popescu I Chirurgia (Bucur); 2008; 103(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 18780612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Kang SW; Lee SC; Lee SH; Lee KY; Jeong JJ; Lee YS; Nam KH; Chang HS; Chung WY; Park CS Surgery; 2009 Dec; 146(6):1048-55. PubMed ID: 19879615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results. Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Development of an endoscopic robotic system with two hands for various gastric tube surgeries. Suzuki N; Sumiyama K; Hattori A; Ikeda K; Murakami EA; Suzuki S; Hayashibe M; Otake Y; Tajiri H Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():349-53. PubMed ID: 15455922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The robotic approach for mediastinal lesions. Augustin F; Schmid T; Bodner J Int J Med Robot; 2006 Sep; 2(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 17520641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]