These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22578836)
1. Image quality of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver using dual-source parallel radiofrequency transmission technology: Comparison with the post-processing correction method for B1 inhomogeneity-induced signal loss. Takayama Y; Nishie A; Asayama Y; Ishigami K; Kakihara D; Nakayama T; Yoshiura T; Obara M; Hirakawa M; Honda H Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3035-40. PubMed ID: 22578836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion weighted imaging of liver lesions suspect for metastases: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lesion contrast are independent from Gd-EOB-DTPA administration. Benndorf M; Schelhorn J; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e849-53. PubMed ID: 22575171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MR imaging and prognosis of borderline lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma. Kobayashi S; Matsui O; Gabata T; Koda W; Minami T; Ryu Y; Kozaka K; Kitao A Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3002-9. PubMed ID: 22748558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New proposal for the staging of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: evaluation of liver fibrosis on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Tsuda N; Okada M; Murakami T Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19026502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Tamada T; Ito K; Sone T; Yamamoto A; Yoshida K; Kakuba K; Tanimoto D; Higashi H; Yamashita T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):636-40. PubMed ID: 19243060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhotic liver enhancement using Gd-EOB-DTPA. Frericks BB; Loddenkemper C; Huppertz A; Valdeig S; Stroux A; Seja M; Wolf KJ; Albrecht T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1053-60. PubMed ID: 19770329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hypointense hepatocellular nodules on hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: can increasing the flip angle improve conspicuity of lesions? Tamada T; Ito K; Yamamoto A; Yasokawa K; Higaki A; Kanki A; Sato T; Tanimoto D; Higashi H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 37(5):1093-9. PubMed ID: 23148032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of liver function in thioacetamide-induced rat acute liver injury using an empirical mathematical model and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA. Saito S; Moriyama Y; Kobayashi S; Ogihara R; Koto D; Kitamura A; Matsushita T; Nishiura M; Murase K J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1483-9. PubMed ID: 22711439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral low intensity sign in hepatic hemangioma: diagnostic pitfall in hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI of the liver. Tamada T; Ito K; Ueki A; Kanki A; Higaki A; Higashi H; Yamamoto A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 35(4):852-8. PubMed ID: 22127980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different signal intensity at Gd-EOB-DTPA compared with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma transgenic mouse model in delayed phase hepatobiliary imaging. Korkusuz H; Knau LL; Kromen W; Bihrer V; Keese D; Piiper A; Vogl TJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jun; 35(6):1397-402. PubMed ID: 22267126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between areas with Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake and without in hepatocellular carcinomas on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase MR imaging: pathological correlation. Lee S; Kim SH; Park CK; Kim YS; Lee WJ; Lim HK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Sep; 32(3):719-25. PubMed ID: 20815073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: evaluation of the effect in signal intensity after Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement. Tamada T; Ito K; Yoshida K; Sone T; Murakami K; Kanki A; Watanabe S; Higashi H; Yamashita T J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 20351500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liver function test by gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with consideration of intrahepatic regional differences. Okubo H; Mogami M; Ozaki Y; Igusa Y; Aoyama T; Amano M; Kokubu S; Miyazaki A; Watanabe S Hepatogastroenterology; 2013 Oct; 60(127):1547-51. PubMed ID: 23933786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative evaluation of liver function with T1 relaxation time index on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: comparison with signal intensity-based indices. Kamimura K; Fukukura Y; Yoneyama T; Takumi K; Tateyama A; Umanodan A; Shindo T; Kumagae Y; Ueno S; Koriyama C; Nakajo M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 40(4):884-9. PubMed ID: 24677659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional magnetic resonance cholangiography enhanced with Gd-EOB-DTPA: effect of liver function on biliary system visualization. Feng ST; Wu L; Chan T; Cai H; Luo Y; Zheng K; Tang D; Li ZP J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1254-8. PubMed ID: 24115466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of classification trees for the qualitative differentiation of focal liver lesions suspicious for metastasis in gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR imaging. Schelhorn J; Benndorf M; Dietzel M; Burmeister HP; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 22618476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radial MRI during free breathing in contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary phase imaging. Gomi T; Nagamoto M; Hasegawa M; Tabata A; Iwasaki M; Ooka M; Murata N; Tsunoo M; Iizuka Y; Kohda E; Shiraga N Acta Radiol; 2014 Feb; 55(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 23873886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium. Gupta RT; Marin D; Boll DT; Husarik DB; Davis DE; Feuerlein S; Merkle EM Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 22138122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects. Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]